1. Each general district court shall have, within the county, including the towns within such county, or city for which it is established, exclusive original jurisdiction for the trial of:
a. All offenses against the ordinances, laws and bylaws of such county, including the towns within such county, or city or of any service district within such county or city, except a city ordinance enacted pursuant to §§ 18.2-372 through 18.2-391.1. All offenses against the ordinances of a service district shall be prosecuted in the name of such service district;
b. All other misdemeanors and traffic infractions arising in such county, including the towns in such county, or city.
2. Each general district court which is established within a city shall also have:
a. Concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit court of such city for all violations of state revenue and election laws; and
b. Exclusive original jurisdiction, except as otherwise provided by general law or the city charter, within the area extending for one mile beyond the corporate limits thereof, for the trial of all offenses against the ordinances, laws and bylaws of the city.
3. If a city lying within a county has no general district court provided by city charter or under general law, then the general district court of the county within which such city lies shall have the same jurisdiction in such city as a general district court established for a city would have.
4. Each general district court shall have such other jurisdiction, exclusive or concurrent, as may be conferred on such court by general law or by provisions of the charter of the city for which the court was established.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection C of § 19.2-244, any county general district court authorized by § 16.1-69.35:01 to be established in a city shall have exclusive original jurisdiction for the trial of all misdemeanors committed within or upon the general district court courtroom.
6. Upon certification by the general district court of any felony charge and ancillary misdemeanor charge or traffic infraction or when an appeal of a conviction of an offense in general district court is noted, jurisdiction as to such charges shall vest in the circuit court, unless such case is reopened pursuant to § 16.1-133.1; a final judgment, order, or decree is modified, vacated, or suspended pursuant to Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 1:1; the appeal has been withdrawn in the general district court within 10 days pursuant to § 16.1-133; or the judge of the general district court, with the consent of the accused and the attorney for the Commonwealth, has delayed a proceeding pursuant to § 19.2-183 or 19.2-186 in order for the accused to complete a specialty docket established pursuant to § 18.2-254.2 or a behavioral health docket established pursuant to § 18.2-254.3.
7. Nothing herein shall affect the jurisdiction conferred on the juvenile and domestic relations district court by Chapter 11 (§ 16.1-226 et seq.).
1984, c. 506; 2019, c. 240; 2021, Sp. Sess. I, c. 187; 2026, cc. 363, 580.
Notes of Decisions
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 754 S.E.2d 533 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 11× “2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Parker v. Commonwealth, 592 S.E.2d 358 (Va. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 4× “Code § 16.1-123.1. There is likewise no dispute that the circuit court had de novo appellate jurisdiction.”
Peterson v. Commonwealth, 363 S.E.2d 440 (Va. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “See Code § 16.1-123.1. Even if the general district court had power to convict the defendant of felony possession, acceptance of a plea to a lesser offense does not constitute an acquittal on the greater offense.”
Painter v. Commonwealth, 623 S.E.2d 408 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
· cites it 2× “See Code § 16.1-123.1.” Peterson v. Commonwealth, 5 Va.”
Grogg v. Commonwealth, 371 S.E.2d 549 (Va. Ct. App. 1988).
“1-296 provides in pertinent part: “From any final order or judgment of the juvenile court affecting the rights or interests of any person coming within its jurisdiction, an appeal may be taken in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7 (§ 16.1-123.1 et seq.) of Title 16.1.”…”
Box v. Talley, 338 S.E.2d 349 (Va. Ct. App. 1986).
“1-296: From any final order or judgment of the juvenile court affecting the rights or interests of any person coming within its jurisdiction, an appeal may be taken in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7 (§ 16.1-123.1 et seq.) of Title 16.1. The reference to Chapter 7 of…”
Bellinger v. Commonwealth, 477 S.E.2d 779 (Va. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 2× “1 (Code § 16.1-123.1, et seq.) provides the manner in which judgments thus rendered are to be memorialized.”
Cox v. Cox, 428 S.E.2d 515 (Va. Ct. App. 1993).
“1-296 provides in pertinent part: From any final order or judgment of the juvenile court affecting the rights or interests of any person coming within its jurisdiction, an appeal may be taken in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7 (§ 16.1-123.1 et. seq.) of [Title 16.1].…”
Terri Lorraine Chilcote v. State of Alaska, 471 P.3d 599 (Alaska Ct. App. 2020).
“Chilcote notes that a Virginia defendant who has been convicted and sentenced at a bench trial, and who then appeals that verdict and exercises their right to a jury trial, may 12 See Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-123.1 ; 16.1-132; 16.”
Douglas v. Commonwealth, 451 S.E.2d 49 (Va. Ct. App. 1994).
“1-296 provides in pertinent part: “From any final order or judgment of the juvenile court affecting the rights or interests of any person coming within its jurisdiction, an appeal may be taken in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 7 (§ 16.”
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1873122 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2014).
· cites it 7× “2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1873122 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2014).
· cites it 7× “2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-123.1(1): 4 cases
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 754 S.E.2d 533 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
“2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1873122 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2014).
“2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1873122 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2014).
“2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-123.1(1)(b): 5 cases
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 754 S.E.2d 533 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).
“2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1873122 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2014).
“2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Ronald Taft Davis, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1873122 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2014).
“2d 440, 445 (1987) (citing Code § 16.1-123.1, which defines the jurisdiction of general district courts to adjudicate misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic violations); see also Painter v.”
Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-123.1(2)(b): 1 case
Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-123.1(b): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.