Any office, store, shop, restaurant, dance hall, theater, poolroom, clubhouse, storehouse, warehouse, dwelling house, apartment or building or structure of any kind which is (i) substantially altered from its original status by means of reinforcement with the intent to impede, deter or delay lawful entry by a law-enforcement officer into such structure, (ii) being used for the purpose of manufacturing or distributing controlled substances or marijuana, and (iii) the object of a valid search warrant, shall be considered a fortified drug house. Any person who maintains or operates a fortified drug house is guilty of a Class 5 felony.
1996, c. 913; 2011, cc. 384, 410; 2014, cc. 674, >719.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2008–2014 · leading case:
Jones v. Com., 661 S.E.2d 412 (Va. 2008).
Jones v. Com., 661 S.E.2d 412 (Va. 2008).
· cites it 12× “At a bench trial in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Sherod Lamont Jones was convicted of maintaining or operating a fortified drug house in violation of Code § 18.2-258.02. 1 The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed his conviction in a per curiam order, Jones v.”
Commonwealth v. Fuller, 88 Va. Cir. 305 (Buchanan Cir. Ct. 2014).
“2-258 for Owning or Maintaining a Common Nuisance and under § 18.2-258.02 for Maintaining a Fortified Drug House, he has standing to assert his Fourth Amendment rights.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.