Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-310 (2026)
Repealed
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Repealed by Acts 2004, c. 995.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1982–2009 · leading case: Wright v. Commonwealth, 670 S.E.2d 772 (Va. Ct. App. 2009).
Wright v. Commonwealth, 670 S.E.2d 772 (Va. Ct. App. 2009). “who simultaneously with knowledge and intent possess[es] any firearm shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.”
Dodson v. Commonwealth, 476 S.E.2d 512 (Va. Ct. App. 1996). “Any firearm or any concealed weapon possessed, transported or carried in violation of this section shall be forfeited to the Commonwealth and disposed of as provided in § 18.2-310. B. The prohibitions of subsection A shall not apply to (i) any person who possesses a firearm or…”
Acey v. Commonwealth, 511 S.E.2d 429 (Va. Ct. App. 1999). “Any firearm or any concealed weapon possessed, transported or carried in violation of this section shall be forfeited to the Commonwealth and disposed of as provided in § 18.2-310.”
Cabell v. Petty, 810 F.2d 463 (4th Cir. 1987). “The plaintiffs’ attorney based his action on Va.Code § 18.2-310 which authorizes the forfeiture of weapons used in commission of crimes.”
Commonwealth v. Cuffee, 16 Va. Cir. 7 (Norfolk Cir. Ct. 1988). “1 Prosecuting attorney, on the other hand, citing the court to § 18.2-310 of the Virginia Code, asks the court to order the rifle forfeited to the Commonwealth, citing its "[use] by any person .”
Commonwealth v. Barb, 5 Va. Cir. 58 (Shenandoah Cir. Ct. 1982). “" Virginia Code § 18.2-310. While the twenty-one day period has passed to amend or modify the final order, nevertheless the gun is still in the custody and control of the Court and may now be subject to forfeiture under the above statute.”
Troy L. Parham v. Commonwealth, No. 2876952 (Va. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 1996). “Any firearm or any concealed weapon possessed, transported or carried in violation of this section shall be forfeited to the Commonwealth and disposed of as provided in § 18.2-310. - 2 - The trial judge rejected Parham's arguments that the statute in effect in 1994 could not be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.