A. An accused is guilty of aggravated sexual battery if he or she sexually abuses the complaining witness, and
1. The complaining witness is less than 13 years of age; or
2. The act is accomplished through the use of the complaining witness's mental incapacity or physical helplessness; or
3. The offense is committed by a parent, step-parent, grandparent, or step-grandparent and the complaining witness is at least 13 but less than 18 years of age; or
4. The act is accomplished against the will of the complaining witness by force, threat or intimidation, and
a. The complaining witness is at least 13 but less than 15 years of age; or
b. The accused causes serious bodily or mental injury to the complaining witness; or
c. The accused uses or threatens to use a dangerous weapon; or
5. The offense is not a recognized form of treatment in the profession, and is committed, without the express consent of the patient, by (i) a massage therapist, or a person purporting to be a massage therapist, during an actual or purported practice of massage therapy, as those terms are defined in § 54.1-3000; (ii) a person practicing or purporting to practice the healing arts, during an actual or purported practice of the healing arts, as those terms are defined in §§ 54.1-2900 and 54.1-2903; or (iii) a physical therapist, or a person purporting to be a physical therapist, during an actual or purported practice of physical therapy, as those terms are defined in § 54.1-3473.
B. Aggravated sexual battery is a felony punishable by confinement in a state correctional facility for a term of not less than one nor more than 20 years and by a fine of not more than $100,000.
1981, c. 397; 1993, c. 590; 2004, c. 843; 2005, cc. 185, 406; 2020, c. 1003.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
313
cases (
106 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case:
Nicholson v. Commonwealth, 694 S.E.2d 788 (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
Nicholson v. Commonwealth, 694 S.E.2d 788 (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 26× “Woodrow Wilson Nicholson (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of aggravated sexual battery, through the use of the victim’s mental incapacity, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.3. On appeal, appellant argues that the Commonwealth failed to prove he committed aggravated sexual…”
De'Armond v. Commonwealth, 654 S.E.2d 317 (Va. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 16× “See Code § 18.2-67.3(A)(1). On appeal, he claims the trial court should have merged the three charges into one.”
Martin v. Com., 630 S.E.2d 291 (Va. 2006).
· cites it 14× “Martin was convicted of aggravated sexual battery, a violation of Code § 18.2-67.3, based on events occurring in February 2003.”
Johnathan Reeves Robinson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 828 S.E.2d 269 (Va. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 7× “First, Johnson had touched the genitalia and buttocks of the victim to sexually arouse or gratify himself, satisfying the requirement in Code § 18.2-67.3 for sexual abuse, as defined in Code § 18.”
Kauffmann v. Commonwealth, 382 S.E.2d 279 (Va. Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 8× “Code § 18.2-67.3. Since the evidence would not support a finding that Kristi was not between thirteen and fifteen years of age, it being uncontradicted that she was fourteen, a sexual battery instruction would have been inappropriate in this case.”
Clark v. Commonwealth, 517 S.E.2d 260 (Va. Ct. App. 1999).
· cites it 8× “On appeal from his convictions of aggravated sexual battery, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.3, and object sexual penetration, in violation of Code § 18.”
Garland v. Commonwealth, 379 S.E.2d 146 (Va. Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 8× “George Oliver Garland, appellant, was convicted on May 8, 1987, in a bench trial of aggravated sexual battery pursuant to the provisions of Code § 18.2-67.3. On appeal he raises the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the prosecutrix’s…”
M.G. v. Albemarle Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 583 S.E.2d 761 (Va. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Virginia’s Code § 18.2-67.3 defines aggravated sexual battery as encompassing the sexual abuse of a complaining witness who is less than thirteen years of age and proscribes the offense as a felony.”
Justo Mazariegos Campos v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 800 S.E.2d 174 (Va. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “HUFF Justo Mazariegos Campos (“appellant”) appeals his convictions of aggravated sexual battery by a parent, in violation of *697 Code § 18.2-67.3(A)(3); carnal knowledge of a child, in violation of Code § 18.”
Wactor v. Commonwealth, 564 S.E.2d 160 (Va. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “1), aggravated sexual battery (Code § 18.2-67.3), and sexual battery (Code § 18.”
Franklin Minor v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 791 S.E.2d 757 (Va. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “Franklin Minor, appellant, was convicted of five counts of aggravated sexual battery by a stepparent in violation of Code § 18.2-67.3 and four counts of rape of a child in violation of Code § 18.”
Walker v. Commonwealth, 404 S.E.2d 394 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
· cites it 14× “Code § 18.2-67.3 provides: Aggravated sexual battery.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(1) — 5 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(2) — 1 case
Martin v. Com., 630 S.E.2d 291 (Va. 2006).
“Martin was convicted of aggravated sexual battery, a violation of Code § 18.2-67.3, based on events occurring in February 2003.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(2)(a) — 1 case
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(3) — 1 case
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A) — 10 cases
Nicholson v. Commonwealth, 694 S.E.2d 788 (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
“Woodrow Wilson Nicholson (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of aggravated sexual battery, through the use of the victim’s mental incapacity, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.3. On appeal, appellant argues that the Commonwealth failed to prove he committed aggravated sexual…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(1) — 46 cases
De'Armond v. Commonwealth, 654 S.E.2d 317 (Va. Ct. App. 2007).
“See Code § 18.2-67.3(A)(1). On appeal, he claims the trial court should have merged the three charges into one.”
Martin v. Com., 630 S.E.2d 291 (Va. 2006).
“Martin was convicted of aggravated sexual battery, a violation of Code § 18.2-67.3, based on events occurring in February 2003.”
Walker v. Commonwealth, 404 S.E.2d 394 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
“Code § 18.2-67.3 provides: Aggravated sexual battery.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(2) — 13 cases
Nicholson v. Commonwealth, 694 S.E.2d 788 (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
“Woodrow Wilson Nicholson (appellant) was convicted in a bench trial of aggravated sexual battery, through the use of the victim’s mental incapacity, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.3. On appeal, appellant argues that the Commonwealth failed to prove he committed aggravated sexual…”
Walker v. Commonwealth, 404 S.E.2d 394 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
“Code § 18.2-67.3 provides: Aggravated sexual battery.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(2)(a) — 1 case
Walker v. Commonwealth, 404 S.E.2d 394 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
“Code § 18.2-67.3 provides: Aggravated sexual battery.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(2)(b) — 2 cases
Walker v. Commonwealth, 404 S.E.2d 394 (Va. Ct. App. 1991).
“Code § 18.2-67.3 provides: Aggravated sexual battery.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(3) — 13 cases
Justo Mazariegos Campos v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 800 S.E.2d 174 (Va. Ct. App. 2017).
“HUFF Justo Mazariegos Campos (“appellant”) appeals his convictions of aggravated sexual battery by a parent, in violation of *697 Code § 18.2-67.3(A)(3); carnal knowledge of a child, in violation of Code § 18.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(4) — 5 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(4)(a) — 4 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(4)(b) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(4)(c) — 2 cases
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(A)(5) — 1 case
— Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.3(B) — 12 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.