Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-392.1 (2026)
Statement of policy
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The General Assembly finds that arrest records can be a hindrance to a citizen's ability to obtain employment and an education. It further finds that the police and court records of those of its citizens who have been absolutely pardoned for crimes for which they have been unjustly convicted or who have demonstrated their rehabilitation can also be a hindrance. This chapter is intended to protect such persons from the unwarranted damage that may occur as a result of being arrested and convicted.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: A.R.A. v. Commonwealth, 809 S.E.2d 660 (Va. 2018).
A.R.A. v. Commonwealth, 809 S.E.2d 660 (Va. 2018). “See Code § 19.2-392.1 (statement of policy stating General Assembly's finding that "arrest records can be a hindrance to an innocent citizen's ability to obtain employment, an education and to obtain credit.”
Hearn v. Hudson, 549 F. Supp. 949 (W.D. Va. 1982). “” Va.Code § 19.2-392.1. It is clear that the administration of records related to law enforcement is a function close to the core of state government.”
Necaise v. Com., 708 S.E.2d 864 (Va. 2011). “A more fundamental reason for our holding is provided by the statement of legislative policy contained in Code § 19.2-392.1, which was enacted simultaneously with Code § 19.”
Commonwealth v. Jackson, 499 S.E.2d 276 (Va. 1998). “” The Commonwealth did not file an answer, but appeared at the hearing on the petition, opposing it on the ground that Jackson was not “innocent” as contemplated in the statement of policy governing expungement contained in Code § 19.”
Gregg v. Commonwealth, 316 S.E.2d 741 (Va. 1984). “This chapter is intended to protect the innocent persons who are arrested from unwarranted damage which may occur as a result of being arrested.”
Com. v. Dotson, 661 S.E.2d 473 (Va. 2008). “Code § 19.2-392.1 contains the following statement of policy: The General Assembly finds that arrest records can be a hindrance to an innocent citizen's ability to obtain employment, an education and to obtain credit.”
Brown v. Com., 677 S.E.2d 220 (Va. 2009). “[3] The policy reason for allowing expungement of police and court records relating to a criminal charge is set forth in Code § 19.2-392.1: The General Assembly finds that arrest records can be a hindrance to an innocent citizen's ability to obtain employment, an education and…”
Ein v. Commonwealth, 436 S.E.2d 610 (Va. 1993). “Ein failed to give notice to [Barry and Lewis], or any other interested party, of his request for the order of expungement; and IT FURTHER APPEARING TO THE COURT that manifest injustice would result from the enforcement of the order of expungement, which was procured in…”
Morris v. Massingill, 61 Va. Cir. 532 (2003). “, Va. Code Ann. §§ 19.2-392.1 to 19.2-392.4 (Lexis 2003).”
Williams v. Commonwealth (Va. 2023). “Code § 19.2-392.1. Where a petitioner is convicted of a lesser included offense of the original charge, the original charge does not qualify for expungement.”
Williams v. Commonwealth (Va. 2023). “Code § 19.2-392.1. Where a petitioner is convicted of a lesser included offense of the original charge, the original charge does not qualify for expungement.”
Woodward v. Commonwealth, 68 Va. Cir. 66 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2005). “at 507 (citing to Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-392.1 ). The Court concluded that “the expungement statute applies to innocent persons, not those who are guilty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.