Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 20-102 (2026)

When not necessary to allege or prove offer of reconciliation

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall not be necessary, in any suit for divorce from the bond of matrimony or from bed and board upon the ground of willful desertion or abandonment, to allege or prove an offer of reconciliation.

1938, p. 382; Michie Code 1942, § 5106a; 1975, c. 644.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1955–2018 · leading case: Nash v. Nash, 108 S.E.2d 350 (Va. 1959).
Nash v. Nash, 108 S.E.2d 350 (Va. 1959). · cites it 2× “Code § 20-102” There we also said at page 701: # * Desertion in the case in judgment is shown by direct proof of the act of leaving and of the intention accompanying the act.”
Miller v. Miller, 85 S.E.2d 221 (Va. 1955). · cites it 2× “Code § 20-102. In the first divorce case to reach this court, Bailey v.”
Michael J. Hill v. Brittney M. Thomas, No. 1113172 (Va. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2018). · cites it 4× “Code § 20-102.” 2 Id. Similarly, in the present case, husband’s failure to include facts alleging that he begged or pleaded with wife to stay (or to specifically state that he even opposed her leaving) does not render his complaint insufficient as a matter of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.