Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 20-121.02 (2026)
Decree of divorce without amended bill or amended cross-bill
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In any divorce suit wherein a bill of complaint or cross-bill prays for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony under § 20-91 or prays for a divorce from bed and board under § 20-95, at such time as there exists in either party's favor grounds for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony under § 20-91 A (9), either party may move the court wherein such divorce suit is pending for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony on the grounds set out in § 20-91 A (9) without amending the bill of complaint or cross-bill.
1977, c. 283; 1984, c. 633; 1986, c. 252; 1988, c. 362; 1989, c. 207.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: Robbins v. Robbins, 632 S.E.2d 615 (Va. Ct. App. 2006).
Robbins v. Robbins, 632 S.E.2d 615 (Va. Ct. App. 2006). “The commissioner, however, recommended a no-fault divorce under Code § 20-121.02. *472 The commissioner also suggested that the chancellor order a 65/35 split of marital assets in favor of husband.”
Klein v. Klein, 396 S.E.2d 866 (Va. Ct. App. 1990). “At a second hearing before the commissioner, on May 11, 1989, the husband orally amended his pleadings under Code § 20-121.02 and presented evidence supporting the granting of a divorce on the ground of one year’s separation.”
Boyd v. Boyd, 340 S.E.2d 578 (Va. Ct. App. 1986). “1 Code § 20-121.02 provides: “Decree of divorce without amended bill.”
Brawand v. Brawand, 338 S.E.2d 651 (Va. Ct. App. 1986). “On the same day that the commissioner filed his report, wife filed a written motion pursuant to Code § 20-121.02 requesting that “in the alternative to her other grounds” she be granted a divorce based on Code § 20-91(9).”
Goodman v. Hamman, 448 S.E.2d 677 (Va. Ct. App. 1994). “Nevertheless, should a nonsuit be granted to husband, wife alternatively moved the court to permit her to “go forward” on her earlier “application” for a divorce pursuant to Code § 20-121.02. 1 *74 Following extensive argument of counsel, the trial court sustained husband’s…”
McCausey v. McCausey, 272 S.E.2d 36 (Va. 1980). “Pursuant to Code § 20-121.02, Suzanne moved for a no-fault divorce under Code § 20-91 (9) (a).”
Lothar W. Nass v. Arlene Wolin Nass (Va. Ct. App. 2001). “Finding the court incorrectly refused to decree the divorce pursuant to Code § 20-91(A)(9), notwithstanding a motion in accordance with Code § 20-121.02, we remand solely for appropriate amendment of the decree.”
Ben Pourbabai v. Christine Pourbabai (Va. Ct. App. 2018). “Code § 20-121.02 provides that a party may move for a divorce based on living separate and apart without amending the complaint for divorce.”
Keyes v. Keyes, 6 Va. Cir. 158 (Virginia Beach Cir. Ct. 1984). “Counsel for the Complainant moved the Court, pursuant to Code Section 20-121.02, for a divorce on the ground of continuous separation for a period in excess of one year.”
Victor Alan Motley, Sr. v. Charlene Byrd Motley (Va. Ct. App. 2007). “He further argues that without jurisdiction of the original bill of complaint, the trial court lacked authority to allow the amendment, that the amendment was made in violation of Rule 1:8, and that the amendment was not pled pursuant to or within the scope of Code § 20-121.02.…”
Amy Lynn Childress v. Jimmie Dewitt Childress, III (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “4 Husband subsequently moved, under Code § 20-121.02, to grant the parties a divorce based on living separate and apart for more than 12 months.”
Harris v. Harris, 14 Va. Cir. 448 (Richmond County Cir. Ct. 1979). “) Virginia Code § 20-121.02, however, does not authorize a final divorce upon the ground that the parties have lived separate and apart without any cohabitation and without interruption for a period of more than one year, unless there is evidence to support that allegation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.