Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 53.1-223 (2026)

Restriction on suits against prisoners

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No action or suit on any claim or demand, except suits for divorce, actions to establish a parent and child relationship between a child and a prisoner and actions to establish a prisoner's child support obligation, shall be maintained against a prisoner after judgment of conviction and while he is incarcerated, except through his committee, unless a guardian ad litem is appointed for the prisoner pursuant to § 8.01-9, or an attorney licensed to practice law in the Commonwealth has entered of record an appearance for such prisoner. However, in any suit for divorce instituted against a prisoner, the court shall appoint a committee prior to any determination as to the property of the parties under § 20-107.3.

Code 1950, § 53-307.1; 1980, c. 504; 1982, c. 636; 1992, c. 398; 2000, c. 404; 2006, c. 553.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Ruffin v. Commonwealth, 393 S.E.2d 425 (Va. Ct. App. 1990).
Ruffin v. Commonwealth, 393 S.E.2d 425 (Va. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 30× “Section 53.1-221 provides that a prisoner's estate, both personal and real, may be committed to a committee.”
Holsapple v. Commonwealth, 574 S.E.2d 756 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “01-9, or a committee, pursuant to Code § 53.1-223, once Frazier forwarded the notice to him while he was incarcerated.”
Ronnie Eugene Tucker v. Donna S. Wimer, 590 S.E.2d 73 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “Tucker contended the paternity determination was void because the trial court had not appointed a committee for him pursuant to Code § 53.1-223. The trial court found that he was not entitled to a committee because he was not incarcerated for a felony conviction and enforced the…”
Holsapple v. Commonwealth, 566 S.E.2d 210 (Va. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “01-9, or a committee, pursuant to Code § 53.1-223, once Frazier forwarded the notice to him while he was incarcerated.”
Buchanan Cnty., VA v. Blankenship, 406 F. Supp. 2d 642 (W.D. Va. 2005). · cites it 4× “A Virginia statute provides that “[n]o action or suit on any claim or demand [except for certain divorce and family actions] shall be instituted against a prisoner after judgment of conviction and while he is incarcerated except through his committee.”
Mark Anthony Grethen v. Sandra Lynn Grethen, No. 3244031 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2005). · cites it 9× “He argued in a “Memorandum of Law” that failing to appoint a committee prior to a monetary award violates Code § 53.1-223. The court denied husband’s motion to dismiss.”
Amy Lynn Childress v. Jimmie Dewitt Childress, III, No. 1374223 (Va. Ct. App. Apr. 9, 2024). · cites it 2× “” After noting that wife was “still” pro se and had an “obligation” to notify the court of any change in her address, 12 Code § 53.1-223 provides that No action or suit on any claim or demand, except suits for divorce, .”
Malinowski v. Carter, 19 Va. Cir. 177 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 1990). “against a prisoner," § 53.1-223 prohibits action against his potential estate without appointment of a Committee.”
In re N. J. S., 17 Va. Cir. 216 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 1989). · cites it 2× “Petitioner, argues that Virginia Code § 53.1-223 prohibits her from filing a civil suit until a committee is appointed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.