Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 57-55.2 (2026)

Charitable solicitation disclosure

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every professional solicitor who solicits contributions from a prospective contributor in the Commonwealth: (i) shall identify himself and his employer; (ii) shall disclose that he is a paid solicitor; and (iii) shall further disclose, in writing, the fact that a financial statement for the last fiscal year is available from the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

1987, c. 561; 2013, c. 24.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1988–1997 · leading case: Telco Commc'ns, Inc. v. Carbaugh, 700 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Va. 1988).
Telco Commc'ns, Inc. v. Carbaugh, 700 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Va. 1988). · cites it 5× “(iii) shall further disclose, in writing, the fact that a financial statement for the last fiscal year is available from the State Office of Consumer Affairs.”
Special Programs, Inc. v. Courter, 923 F. Supp. 851 (E.D. Va. 1996). · cites it 6× “See VaCode Ann. §§ 57-55.2 & 57-61 (Michie 1995).”
Telco Commc'ns, Inc. v. Carbaugh, 885 F.2d 1225 (4th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “at 2679 , Va.Code Ann. § 57-55.2 is a boilerplate requirement which will affect all solicitors equally.”
Commonwealth ex rel. Gilmore v. Smoky Mountain Secrets, Inc., 41 Va. Cir. 564 (Richmond County Cir. Ct. 1997). · cites it 2× “In count I, the Commonwealth alleges that Smoky Mountain violated § 57-55.2 of the Solicitation law when its telemarketers failed to identify or disclose that they were Smoky Mountain employees and that they or Smoky Mountain were paid solicitors for the VSPA.”
Va. Code Ann. § 57-55.2(iii): 1 case
Telco Commc'ns, Inc. v. Carbaugh, 700 F. Supp. 294 (E.D. Va. 1988). “(iii) shall further disclose, in writing, the fact that a financial statement for the last fiscal year is available from the State Office of Consumer Affairs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.