Washington issues › Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Supervised Release and Offender Commitment

17 issues with Washington opinions2002–2026

Due process rights regarding clarity of supervised release conditions23 opinions · 2005–2025
Defining vagueness in supervised release conditions16 opinions · 2016–2022
Analyzing overbreadth of internet access restrictions9 opinions · 2018–2026
Analyzing conditions for supervised release and gang association9 opinions · 2008–2021
Reviewing supervised release conditions and probation officer authority8 opinions · 2008–2025
Construing supervised release conditions to require knowing association6 opinions · 2002–2021
Striking unconstitutionally vague supervised release conditionsthin3 opinions · 2016–2022
Remanding for narrowly circumscribed supervised release conditionsthin3 opinions · 2014
Applying ex post facto clause to supervised release revocationthin2 opinions · 2012
Determining validity of supervised release conditionsthin2 opinions · 2009
Trial court discretion in revisiting exceptional sentencesthin2 opinions · 2013–2020
Reviewing conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretionthin1 opinions · 2020
Reviewing plain error on supervised release conditionsthin1 opinions · 2020
Defining the purpose and scope of supervised releasethin1 opinions · 2011
Balancing internet access and public safety in supervised releasethin1 opinions · 2020
Determining fair notice for supervised release conditionsthin1 opinions · 2019
Imposing special conditions of supervised releasethin1 opinions · 2019

Counts are Washington courts’ opinions citing pages in each issue.

How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

Supervised Release and Offender Commitment