Wash. Rev. Code » Title 10 · Chapter 10.19
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 10.19.100 (2025)

Stay of execution of forfeiture judgment—Bond

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The parties, or either of them, against whom such judgment may be entered in the superior or supreme courts, may stay said execution for sixty days by giving a bond with two or more sureties, to be approved by the clerk, conditioned for the payment of such judgment at the expiration of sixty days, unless the same shall be vacated before the expiration of that time.
[ 1891 c 28 s 86; Code 1881 s 1138; 1873 p 242 s 281; 1867 p 103 s 2; RRS s 2232. FORMER PART OF SECTION: 1891 c 28 s 87; Code 1881 s 1139; 1867 p 103 s 3; RRS s 2233, now codified as RCW 10.19.105.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1965–2009 · leading case: State v. Kramer, 167 Wash. 2d 548 (2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Kramer, 167 Wash. 2d 548 (2009). · cites it 29× “The original enactments are nearly identical to the current provisions RCW 10.19.100 and .105. Compare RCW 10.19.”
State v. Kramer, 219 P.3d 700 (Wash. 2009). · cites it 28× “The original enactments are nearly identical to the current provisions RCW 10.19.100 and .105. Compare RCW 10.19.”
State v. Hampton, 728 P.2d 1049 (Wash. 1986). · cites it 3× “The pertinent statutes are RCW 10.19.100 and .105, which provide: The parties, or either of them, against whom such judgment may he entered in the superior or supreme courts, may stay said execution for sixty days by giving a bond with two or more sureties, to be approved by the…”
State v. Hampton, 709 P.2d 1221 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 6× “105 provides that: If a bond be given and execution stayed, as provided in RCW 10.19.100, and the person for whose appearance such recognizance was given shall be produced in court before the expiration of said period of sixty days, the judge may vacate such judgment upon such…”
State v. Mullen, 401 P.2d 991 (Wash. 1965). · cites it 3× “Appellant argues that it was denied the benefit of RCW 10.19.100 and RCW 10.19.105. RCW 10.19.”
State v. Ringrose, 426 P.2d 848 (Wash. 1967). · cites it 6× “On November 22, 1966, the superior court granted a stay of execution of the judgment of forfeiture for a period of 60 *101 days, under RCW 10.19.100. At the expiration of the 60 days, the sureties moved the superior court for an additional stay of execution; and, on January 24,…”
State v. Molina, 507 P.2d 909 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973). “105 provides for vacation of a forfeiture judgment as follows: “If a bond be given and execution stayed, as provided in RCW 10.19.100, and the person for whose appearance such recognizance was given shall be produced in court before the expiration of said period of sixty days,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.