Wash. Rev. Code » Title 10 · Chapter 10.66
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 10.66.020 (2026)

When order may be issued

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A court may enter an off-limits order enjoining a known drug trafficker who has been associated with drug trafficking in an area that the court finds to be a PADT area, from entering or remaining in a designated PADT area for up to one year. This relief may be ordered pursuant to applications for injunctive relief or as part of a criminal proceeding as follows:
(1) In a civil action, including an action brought under this chapter;
(2) In a nuisance abatement action pursuant to chapter 7.43 RCW;
(3) In an eviction action to exclude known drug traffickers or tenants who were evicted for allowing drug trafficking to occur on the premises which were the subject of the eviction action;
(4) As a condition of pretrial release of a known drug trafficker awaiting trial on drug charges. The order shall be in effect until the time of sentencing or dismissal of the criminal charges; or
(5) As a condition of sentencing of any known drug trafficker convicted of a drug offense. The order may include all periods of community placement or community supervision.
[ 1989 c 271 s 215.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2007 · leading case: State v. Clark, 916 P.2d 384 (Wash. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Clark, 916 P.2d 384 (Wash. 2007). “See RCW 10.66.020 ("off-limits" orders to keep traffickers out of known illegal drug sales areas).”
State v. Clark, 129 Wash. 2d 211 (Wash. 1996). “See RCW 10.66.020 ("off-limits” orders to keep traffickers out of known illegal drug sales areas).”
State v. White, 888 P.2d 169 (Wash. Ct. App. 1995). “Under RCW 10.66.020, a court may enjoin a person identified as a known drug trafficker from an area it finds to be an area protected against drug trafficking (PADT area).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.