Wash. Rev. Code » Title 11 · Chapter 11.106
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.106.050 (2026)

Account filed—Return day—Notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
When any account has been filed pursuant to RCW 11.106.030 or 11.106.040, the clerk of the court where filed shall fix a return day therefor as provided in RCW 11.96A.100(4) and issue a notice. The notice shall state the time and place for the return date, the name or names of the trustee or trustees who have filed the account, that the account has been filed, that the court is asked to settle the account, and that any objections or exceptions to the account must be filed with the clerk of the court on or before the return date. The notice shall be given as provided for notices under RCW 11.96A.110.
[ 1999 c 42 s 628; 1985 c 30 s 99. Prior: 1984 c 149 s 132; 1955 c 33 s 30.30.050; prior: 1951 c 226 s 5. Formerly RCW 30.30.050.]

Notes:

Effective date—1999 c 42: See RCW 11.96A.902.
Short title—Application—Purpose—Severability—1985 c 30: See RCW 11.02.900 through 11.02.903.
Severability—Effective dates—1984 c 149: See notes following RCW 11.02.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: Anderson v. Dussault, 333 P.3d 395 (Wash. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anderson v. Dussault, 333 P.3d 395 (Wash. 2014). · cites it 2× “RCW 11.106.050. In order to facilitate this objection process, the TAA provides that “[t]he court shall appoint guardians ad litem as provided in RCW 11.”
Anderson v. Dussault (Wash. 2014). · cites it 2× “RCW 11.106.050. In order to facilitate this objection 6 No.”
In Re: Gust Rakus Credit Trust (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “7 RCW 11.106.050. 8 RCW 11.106.060. 5 No. 79566-0-I/6 propriety of all actions of the trustee or trustees set forth in the account including the purchase, retention, and disposition of any of the property and funds of the trust, and shall render its decree either approving or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.