Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 18.64.165 (2025)
Additional actions against license
✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In addition to any other grounds, the commission may take action against a license issued under this chapter and chapters 18.64A, 69.38, 69.41, 69.43, 69.45, and 69.50 RCW, except nonresident pharmacies, upon proof that:
(1) The license was procured through fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit;
(2) Except as provided in RCW 9.97.020, the licensee has violated or has permitted any employee to violate any of the laws of this state or the United States relating to drugs, controlled substances, cosmetics, or nonprescription drugs, or has violated any of the rules and regulations of the commission or has been convicted of a felony.
[ 2024 c 121 s 37; 2016 c 81 s 10; 2013 c 19 s 14; 1995 c 319 s 5. Prior: 1989 1st ex.s. c 9 s 404; 1989 c 352 s 4; 1979 c 90 s 14; 1963 c 38 s 15.]
Notes:
Finding—Conflict with federal requirements—2016 c 81: See notes following RCW 9.97.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2001–2007 · leading case: State v. Krzeszowski, 24 P.3d 485 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001).
State v. Krzeszowski, 24 P.3d 485 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “158(1)); engage in various pharmacy-related activities (RCW 18.64.165(2)); work in collection agencies (RCW 19.”
Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 524 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (W.D. Wash. 2007). “The Board is authorized to take disciplinary action against a pharmacy license per RCW 18.64.165. The Uniform Disciplinary Act provides procedures for disciplining health care providers, including pharmacists, who violate standards of professional conduct.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 18.64.165(2): 1 case
State v. Krzeszowski, 24 P.3d 485 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “158(1)); engage in various pharmacy-related activities (RCW 18.64.165(2)); work in collection agencies (RCW 19.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.