Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Every person acting as a farm labor contractor shall:
(1) Carry a current farm labor contractor's license at all times and exhibit it to all persons with whom the contractor intends to deal in the capacity of a farm labor contractor prior to so dealing.
(2) Disclose to every person with whom he or she deals in the capacity of a farm labor contractor the amount of his or her bond and the existence and amount of any claims against the bond.
(3) File at the United States post office serving the address of the contractor, as noted on the face of the farm labor contractor's license, a correct change of address immediately upon each occasion the contractor permanently moves his or her address, and notify the director within ten days after an address change is made.
(4) Promptly when due, pay or distribute to the individuals entitled thereto all moneys or other things of value entrusted to the contractor by any third person for such purpose.
(5) Comply with the terms and provisions of all legal and valid agreements and contracts entered into between the contractor in the capacity of a farm labor contractor and third persons.
(6) File information regarding work offers with the nearest employment service office, such information to include wages and work to be performed and any other information prescribed by the director.
(7) On a form prescribed by the director, furnish to each worker, at the time of hiring, recruiting, soliciting, or supplying, whichever occurs first, a written statement in English and any other language common to workers who are not fluent or literate in English that contains a description of:
(a) The compensation to be paid and the method of computing the rate of compensation;
(b) The terms and conditions of any bonus offered, including the manner of determining when the bonus is earned;
(c) The terms and conditions of any loan made to the worker;
(d) The conditions of any transportation, housing, board, health, and day care services or any other employee benefit to be provided by the farm labor contractor or by his or her agents, and the costs to be charged for each of them;
(e) The terms and conditions of employment, including the approximate length of season or period of employment and the approximate starting and ending dates thereof, and the crops on which and kinds of activities in which the worker may be employed;
(f) The terms and conditions under which the worker is furnished clothing or equipment;
(g) The place of employment;
(h) The name and address of the owner of all operations, or the owner's agent, where the worker will be working as a result of being recruited, solicited, supplied, or employed by the farm labor contractor;
(i) The existence of a labor dispute at the worksite;
(j) The name and address of the farm labor contractor;
(k) The existence of any arrangements with any owner or agent of any establishment at the place of employment under which the farm labor contractor is to receive a fee or any other benefit resulting from any sales by such establishment to the workers; and
(l) The name and address of the surety on the contractor's bond and the workers' right to claim against the bond.
(8) Furnish to the worker each time the worker receives a compensation payment from the farm labor contractor, a written statement itemizing the total payment and the amount and purpose of each deduction therefrom, hours worked, rate of pay, and pieces done if the work is done on a piece rate basis, and if the work is done under the Service Contract Act (41 U.S.C. Secs. 351 through 401) or related federal or state law, a written statement of any applicable prevailing wage.
(9) With respect to each worker recruited, solicited, employed, supplied, or hired by the farm labor contractor:
(a) Make, keep, and preserve for three years a record of the following information:
(i) The basis on which wages are paid;
(ii) The number of piecework units earned, if paid on a piecework basis;
(iii) The number of hours worked;
(iv) The total pay period earnings;
(v) The specific sums withheld and the purpose of each sum withheld; and
(vi) The net pay; and
(b) Provide to any other farm labor contractor and to any user of farm labor for whom he or she recruits, solicits, supplies, hires, or employs workers copies of all records, with respect to each such worker, which the contractor is required by this chapter to make, keep, and preserve. The recipient of such records shall keep them for a period of three years from the end of the period of employment. When necessary to administer this chapter, the director may require that any farm labor contractor provide the director with certified copies of his or her payroll records for any payment period.
The recordkeeping requirements of this chapter shall be met if either the farm labor contractor or any user of the contractor's services makes, keeps, and preserves for the requisite time period the records required under this section, and so long as each worker receives the written statements specified in subsection (8) of this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1993–2022 · leading case: Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co., 369 P.3d 150 (Wash. 2016).
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co., 369 P.3d 150 (Wash. 2016). “The *177 district court certified the plaintiff class as to two FLCA claims: (1) that NW violated RCW 19.30.110(1) by failing to carry a current farm labor contractor’s license and (2) that NW violated RCW 19.”
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “020(1) (requiring any person acting as a “farm labor contractor” to be licensed by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries); RCW 19.30.110(1) (requiring farm labor contractor to carry a current license at all times and “exhibit it to all persons with whom the…”
Escobar v. Baker, 814 F. Supp. 1491 (W.D. Wash. 1993). “§ 1822 (c), RCW 19.30.110(5) and RCW 19.-30.120(2); (3) plaintiffs’ claim that Dobbins and Soto breached contracts with the plaintiffs; and (4) plaintiffs’ claims that Dobbins and Baker retaliated against plaintiffs in violation of 29 U.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “110 requires every farm labor contractor to “(2) 15 [d]isclose to every person with who he or she deals in the capacity of a farm labor 16 contractor the amount of his or her bond and the existence and amount of any claims 17 against the bond,” to “(5) [c]omply with the terms…”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “at 34-35 , ¶ B; and (3) “FLCA 18 Class” for violations under RCW 19.30.110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “” Where this statute specifies that a “lawful agent” is one who 7 accepts service of summons is an indication the Washington Legislature did not so 8 limit the term “agent” in RCW 19.30.110. See Densley v. Dep’t of Ret.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s 3 motion for partial summary judgment is granted.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “And Defendant tacitly admitted as much 11 when they failed to object to Plaintiffs’ filing their First Amended Complaint, which 12 raised FLCA Disclosure Claims under Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110 (7)(h). See 13 ECF No.”
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co. (Wash. 2016). “The only provision violated here was RCW 19.30.110(1), the separate statute that requires a "farm labor contractor" to "[ c]arry a current farm labor contractor's license.”
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co. (Wash. 2016). “The only provision violated here was RCW 19.30.110(1), the separate statute that requires a "farm labor contractor" to "[ c]arry a current farm labor contractor's license.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110(1) — 6 cases
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co., 369 P.3d 150 (Wash. 2016). “The *177 district court certified the plaintiff class as to two FLCA claims: (1) that NW violated RCW 19.30.110(1) by failing to carry a current farm labor contractor’s license and (2) that NW violated RCW 19.”
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “020(1) (requiring any person acting as a “farm labor contractor” to be licensed by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries); RCW 19.30.110(1) (requiring farm labor contractor to carry a current license at all times and “exhibit it to all persons with whom the…”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s 3 motion for partial summary judgment is granted.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “at 34-35 , ¶ B; and (3) “FLCA 18 Class” for violations under RCW 19.30.110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.”
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co. (Wash. 2016). “The only provision violated here was RCW 19.30.110(1), the separate statute that requires a "farm labor contractor" to "[ c]arry a current farm labor contractor's license.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110(2) — 3 cases
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “at 34-35 , ¶ B; and (3) “FLCA 18 Class” for violations under RCW 19.30.110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “” Where this statute specifies that a “lawful agent” is one who 7 accepts service of summons is an indication the Washington Legislature did not so 8 limit the term “agent” in RCW 19.30.110. See Densley v. Dep’t of Ret.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “110 requires every farm labor contractor to “(2) 15 [d]isclose to every person with who he or she deals in the capacity of a farm labor 16 contractor the amount of his or her bond and the existence and amount of any claims 17 against the bond,” to “(5) [c]omply with the terms…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110(5) — 3 cases
Escobar v. Baker, 814 F. Supp. 1491 (W.D. Wash. 1993). “§ 1822 (c), RCW 19.30.110(5) and RCW 19.-30.120(2); (3) plaintiffs’ claim that Dobbins and Soto breached contracts with the plaintiffs; and (4) plaintiffs’ claims that Dobbins and Baker retaliated against plaintiffs in violation of 29 U.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “110 requires every farm labor contractor to “(2) 15 [d]isclose to every person with who he or she deals in the capacity of a farm labor 16 contractor the amount of his or her bond and the existence and amount of any claims 17 against the bond,” to “(5) [c]omply with the terms…”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “at 34-35 , ¶ B; and (3) “FLCA 18 Class” for violations under RCW 19.30.110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110(7) — 6 cases
Escobar v. Baker, 814 F. Supp. 1491 (W.D. Wash. 1993). “§ 1822 (c), RCW 19.30.110(5) and RCW 19.-30.120(2); (3) plaintiffs’ claim that Dobbins and Soto breached contracts with the plaintiffs; and (4) plaintiffs’ claims that Dobbins and Baker retaliated against plaintiffs in violation of 29 U.”
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “020(1) (requiring any person acting as a “farm labor contractor” to be licensed by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries); RCW 19.30.110(1) (requiring farm labor contractor to carry a current license at all times and “exhibit it to all persons with whom the…”
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co., 369 P.3d 150 (Wash. 2016). “The *177 district court certified the plaintiff class as to two FLCA claims: (1) that NW violated RCW 19.30.110(1) by failing to carry a current farm labor contractor’s license and (2) that NW violated RCW 19.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “110 requires every farm labor contractor to “(2) 15 [d]isclose to every person with who he or she deals in the capacity of a farm labor 16 contractor the amount of his or her bond and the existence and amount of any claims 17 against the bond,” to “(5) [c]omply with the terms…”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “at 34-35 , ¶ B; and (3) “FLCA 18 Class” for violations under RCW 19.30.110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110(7)(a) — 1 case
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “020(1) (requiring any person acting as a “farm labor contractor” to be licensed by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries); RCW 19.30.110(1) (requiring farm labor contractor to carry a current license at all times and “exhibit it to all persons with whom the…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110(7)(h) — 3 cases
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “” Where this statute specifies that a “lawful agent” is one who 7 accepts service of summons is an indication the Washington Legislature did not so 8 limit the term “agent” in RCW 19.30.110. See Densley v. Dep’t of Ret.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2021). “And Defendant tacitly admitted as much 11 when they failed to object to Plaintiffs’ filing their First Amended Complaint, which 12 raised FLCA Disclosure Claims under Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.110 (7)(h). See 13 ECF No.”
Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Servs. LLC (E.D. Wash. 2022). “at 34-35 , ¶ B; and (3) “FLCA 18 Class” for violations under RCW 19.30.110(1), (2), (5), (7); RCW 19.30.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.