Wash. Rev. Code » Title 19 · Chapter 19.30
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.30.200 (2026)

Unlicensed farm labor contractors—Liability for services

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person who knowingly uses the services of an unlicensed farm labor contractor shall be personally, jointly, and severally liable with the person acting as a farm labor contractor to the same extent and in the same manner as provided in this chapter. In making determinations under this section, any user may rely upon either the license issued by the director to the farm labor contractor under RCW 19.30.030 or the director's representation that such contractor is licensed as required by this chapter.
[ 2000 c 171 s 48; 1985 c 280 s 14.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1993–2016 · leading case: Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co., 369 P.3d 150 (Wash. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co., 369 P.3d 150 (Wash. 2016). · cites it 20× “” The second question implicates RCW 19.30.200. That statute imposes joint and several liability for FLCA violations on “[a]ny person who knowingly uses the services of an unlicensed farm labor contractor” and then states, “In making determinations under this section, any user…”
Yapuna v. Global Horizons Manpower Inc., 254 F.R.D. 407 (E.D. Wash. 2008). · cites it 9× “Wash. Rev.Code § 19.30.200 states: Any person who knowingly uses the services of an unlicensed farm labor contractor shall be personally, jointly, and severally liable with the person acting as a farm labor contractor to the same extent and in the same manner as provided in this…”
Perez-Farias v. Global Horizons, Inc., 286 P.3d 46 (Wash. 2012). “” RCW 19.30.200. The Workers sought only statutory damages under the FLCA.”
Escobar v. Baker, 814 F. Supp. 1491 (W.D. Wash. 1993). “§ 1842 , RCW 19.30.200. In determining whether Hipólito Soto was a farm labor contractor under the AWPA and FLCA, the Court must determine (1) whether he performed any farm labor contracting activity, (2) for a fee.”
Saucedo v. NW Mgmt. & Realty Servs., Inc., 290 F.R.D. 671 (E.D. Wash. 2013). “& Health Insurance and Texas Municipal Plans Consortium (collectively “John Hancock”) jointly and severally liable under the FLCA on the theory that Farmland, as the lessee of the orchards at which class members worked, and John Hancock, as the owner and lessor of the orchards,…”
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co. (Wash. 2016). · cites it 19× “" The second question implicates RCW 19.30.200. That statute imposes joint and several liability for FLCA violations on "[a]ny person who knowingly uses the services of an 3 Saucedo et al.”
Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Ins. Co. (Wash. 2016). · cites it 16× “" The second question implicates RCW 19.30.200. That statute imposes joint and several liability for FLCA violations on "[a]ny person who knowingly uses the services of an 3               Saucedo et al.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.