Wash. Rev. Code » Title 19 · Chapter 19.86
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86.130 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A final judgment or decree rendered in any action brought under RCW 19.86.080 by the state of Washington to the effect that a defendant has violated RCW 19.86.020, 19.86.030, 19.86.040, 19.86.050, or 19.86.060 shall be prima facie evidence against such defendant in any action brought by any party against such defendant under RCW 19.86.090 as to all matters which said judgment or decree would be an estoppel as between the parties thereto: PROVIDED, That this section shall not apply to consent judgments or decrees where the court makes no finding of illegality.
[ 1970 ex.s. c 26 s 6; 1961 c 216 s 13.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2024 · leading case: State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., 553 P.2d 423 (Wash. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., 553 P.2d 423 (Wash. 1976). · cites it 6× “020 occurring after May 14, 1970, and before the date of final determination of this action, pursuant to RCW 19.86.130. The reference in paragraph F to RCW 19.”
Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Off. of Attorney Gen., 300 P.3d 799 (Wash. 2013). “(emphasis omitted) (citing RCW 19.86.130). If a private plaintiff prevails in a CPA action, the trial court may award damages, including treble damages up to $25,000 per consumer.”
State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., 59 A.L.R. 3d 1209 (Wash. 1973). · cites it 2× “RCW 19.86.130. The legitimate purposes the state seeks to effectuate by the adjudication claim are a finding of what practices are prohibited and a resulting decree for use in private litigation.”
State v. Ralph Williams'nw Chrysler, 510 P.2d 233 (Wash. 1973). · cites it 2× “RCW 19.86.130. The legitimate purposes the state seeks to effectuate by the adjudication claim are a finding of what practices are prohibited and a resulting decree for use in private litigation.”
Taylor v. Amazon.com Inc (W.D. Wash. 2024). “19 CPA claims are subject to a four-year statute of limitations, RCW 19.86.130, which 20 “begin to run ‘when a party has the right to apply to a court for relief,’ or, alternatively, ‘when 21 the plaintiff, through the exercise of due diligence, knew or should have known the…”
Ameriquest Mortg. Co. v. Off. of Att'y Gen. (Wash. 2013). “(emphasis omitted) (citing RCW 19.86.130). If a private plaintiff prevails in a CPA action, the trial court may award damages, including treble damages up to $25,000 per consumer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.