Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 2.64.055 (2026)

Disciplinary actions authorized

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The commission is authorized to impose the following disciplinary actions, in increasing order of severity: (a) Admonishment; (b) reprimand; or (c) censure. If the conduct of the judge or justice warrants more severe disciplinary action, the commission may recommend to the supreme court the suspension or removal of the judge or justice.
[ 1989 c 367 s 4.]

Notes:

Contingent effective date1989 c 367: See note following RCW 2.64.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1992–1999 · leading case: In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Turco, 970 P.2d 731 (Wash. 1999).
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Turco, 970 P.2d 731 (Wash. 1999). “RCW 2.64.055 provides for progressive levels of discipline by the Commission and the Supreme Court against a judge who has engaged in misconduct.”
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stoker, 827 P.2d 986 (Wash. 1992). “14 RCW 2.64.055. See RCW 2.64.010. 15 The supreme court may censure, suspend, or remove a judge .”
In Re Turco, 970 P.2d 731 (Wash. 1999). “RCW 2.64.055 provides for progressive levels of discipline by the Commission and the Supreme Court against a judge who has engaged in misconduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.