Wash. Rev. Code » Title 34 · Chapter 34.05
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.431 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Agencies may hold prehearing or other conferences for the settlement or simplification of issues. Every agency shall by rule describe the conditions under which and the manner in which conferences are to be held.
(2) In the discretion of the presiding officer, and where the rights of the parties will not be prejudiced thereby, all or part of the conference may be conducted by telephone, television, or other electronic means. Each participant in the conference must have an opportunity to participate effectively in, to hear, and, if technically and economically feasible, to see the entire proceeding while it is taking place.
[ 1988 c 288 s 408.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–2006 · leading case: Clausing v. State, 955 P.2d 394 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Clausing v. State, 955 P.2d 394 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). “, RCW 34.05.431(2); RCW 34.05.449(3). The Department’s own adjudicative procedures also permit telephone proceedings.”
Clausing v. State, 955 P.2d 394 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). “, RCW 34.05.431(2); RCW 34.05.449(3). The Department's own adjudicative procedures also permit telephone proceedings.”
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Washington Toxics Coalition, 843 P.2d 1092 (Wash. Ct. App. 1993). “RCW 34.05.431, .437, .449, .452; RCW 34.05.”
Lawrence v. Dep't of Health, 138 P.3d 124 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “098; RCW 34.05.431; State v. Swarva, 86 Wash.2d 29, 33 , 541 P.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.431(2) — 2 cases
Clausing v. State, 955 P.2d 394 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). “, RCW 34.05.431(2); RCW 34.05.449(3). The Department’s own adjudicative procedures also permit telephone proceedings.”
Clausing v. State, 955 P.2d 394 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). “, RCW 34.05.431(2); RCW 34.05.449(3). The Department's own adjudicative procedures also permit telephone proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.