Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 35.91.050 (2026)

Owner's pro rata share of cost to which he or she did not contribute

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever the cost, or any part thereof, of any water or sewer improvement, whether local or general, is or will be assessed against the owners of real estate and such water or sewer improvement will be connected into or will make use of, contracted water or sewer facilities constructed under the provisions of this chapter and to the cost of which such owners, or any of them, did not contribute, there shall be included in the engineer's estimate before the hearing on any such improvement, separately itemized, and in such assessments, a sum equal to the amount provided in or computed from such contract as the fair pro rata share due from such owners upon and for such contracted water or sewer facilities.

[ 1965 c 7 s 35.91.050. Prior: 1959 c 261 s 5.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2003 · leading case: Stone v. Sw. Suburban Sewer Dist., 65 P.3d 1230 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Stone v. Sw. Suburban Sewer Dist., 65 P.3d 1230 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “…(1999). [7] State v. Keller, 98 Wash.App. 381, 383-84 , 990 P.2d 423 (1999). [8] RCW 35.91.020 (italics ours). [9] RCW 35.91.050 (italics ours).”

Stone v. Sw. Suburban Sewer Dist., 116 Wash. App. 434 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “…976 P.2d 619 (1999). State v. Keller, 98 Wn. App. 381, 383-84 , 990 P.2d 423 (1999). RCW 35.91.020 (emphasis added). RCW 35.91.050 (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.