Wash. Rev. Code » Title 35A · Chapter 35A.64
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 35A.64.200 (2026)

Eminent domain by cities

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A code city may exercise all powers relating to eminent domain as authorized by chapters 8.12 and 8.28 RCW in accordance with the procedures therein prescribed and subject to any limitations therein provided.
[ 1967 ex.s. c 119 s 35A.64.200.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2004–2014 · leading case: City of Bellevue v. Pine Forest Props., Inc., 340 P.3d 938 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Bellevue v. Pine Forest Props., Inc., 340 P.3d 938 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “030, RCW 35A.64.200, RCW 81.104.010, RCW 81.112.”
Wong v. City of Long Beach, 82 P.3d 259 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Second, RCW 35A.64.200 provides: “A code city may exercise all powers relating to eminent domain as authorized by chapters 8.”
In Re Petition of City of Long Beach, 82 P.3d 259 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Second, RCW 35A.64.200 provides: "A code city may exercise all powers relating to eminent domain as authorized by chapters 8.”
Pine Forest Props. v. City Of Bellevue (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “030 and RCW 35A.64.200. 14. The potential condemnor's determination of public interest and necessity, including the type and extent of property interest, is conclusive absent proof of actual fraud or such arbitrary and capricious conduct as would constitute constructive fraud.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.