Wash. Rev. Code » Title 36 · Chapter 36.70
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70.380 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Before approving all or any part of the comprehensive plan or any amendment, extension or addition thereto, the commission shall hold at least one public hearing and may hold additional hearings at the discretion of the commission.
[ 1963 c 4 s 36.70.380. Prior: 1959 c 201 s 38.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1969–1983 · leading case: Smith v. Skagit Cnty., 453 P.2d 832 (Wash. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Skagit Cnty., 453 P.2d 832 (Wash. 1969). · cites it 4× “RCW 36.70.380. "When changed conditions or further studies by the planning agency indicate a need, the commission may amend, extend or add to all or part of the comprehensive plan .”
Chrobuck v. Snohomish Cnty., 480 P.2d 489 (Wash. 1971). · cites it 2× “In connection with the adoption of a comprehensive plan, the implementation thereof by regulatory controls, and the subsequent amendment of either the comprehensive plan or the regulations, RCW 36.70.380, .400, .410, .580, and .600 require a public hearing, after notice, before…”
Norco Constr., Inc. v. King Cnty., 649 P.2d 103 (Wash. 1982). “RCW 36.70.380. In light of the County's failure to use the powers it had at its disposal under law, the trial court's writ of mandamus was an entirely appropriate response to the County's lengthy deferral of a decision on Norco's plat application in violation of RCW *691 58.”
Harris v. Hornbaker, 658 P.2d 1219 (Wash. 1983). “For example, the adoption of a comprehensive zoning plan involves statutory public hearings, RCW 36.70.380, but the decisionmaking body nevertheless acts in a legislative, "policy making capacity.”
Byers v. Bd. of Clallam Cy. Comm'rs, 529 P.2d 823 (Wash. 1974). “2d 832 (1969), we held that RCW 36.70.380 (adoption of or amendment to comprehensive plans) and RCW 36.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.