Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 4.16.360 (2026)
Application of chapter to parentage action
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1994–2006 · leading case: 1000 Virginia Ltd. P'ship v. Vertecs Corp., 146 P.3d 423 (Wash. 2006).
1000 Virginia Ltd. P'ship v. Vertecs Corp., 146 P.3d 423 (Wash. 2006). “2d 631 (1969) (applying the discovery rule in a medical malpractice claim) superseded by statute, RCW 4.16.360, as recognized in Teeter v. Lawson, 25 Wash.”
1000 Virginia Ltd. P'ship v. Vertecs Corp., 158 Wash. 2d 566 (Wash. 2006). “2d 631 (1969) (applying the discovery rule in a medical malpractice claim), superseded by statute, *599 RCW 4.16.360, as recognized in Teeter v. Lawson, 25 Wn.”
State Ex Rel. O'Brien v. Cooperrider, 887 P.2d 408 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “130(3)), it follows that RCW 4.16.080 does not control RCW 26.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.