Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.220 (2026)
Order of taking challenges
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The challenges of either party shall be taken separately in the following order, including in each challenge all the causes of challenge belonging to the same class:
(1) Challenges for cause.
(2) Peremptory challenges.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1991–1992 · leading case: Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson Sch. Dist. No. 303, 812 P.2d 133 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991).
Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson Sch. Dist. No. 303, 812 P.2d 133 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991). “16 RCW 4.44.220 states: "The challenges of either party shall be taken separately in the following order, including in each challenge all the causes of challenge belonging to the same class: "(1) For general disqualification.”
Carle v. McChord Credit Union, 827 P.2d 1070 (Wash. Ct. App. 1992). “McChord reiterates its arguments on appeal. The trial court did not err by considering the challenge even though it was untimely.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.220(3) — 1 case
Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson Sch. Dist. No. 303, 812 P.2d 133 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991). “16 RCW 4.44.220 states: "The challenges of either party shall be taken separately in the following order, including in each challenge all the causes of challenge belonging to the same class: "(1) For general disqualification.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.220(4) — 1 case
Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson Sch. Dist. No. 303, 812 P.2d 133 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991). “16 RCW 4.44.220 states: "The challenges of either party shall be taken separately in the following order, including in each challenge all the causes of challenge belonging to the same class: "(1) For general disqualification.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.