Wash. Rev. Code » Title 4 · Chapter 4.96
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 4.96.050 (2025)

Bond not required

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No bond is required of any local governmental entity for any purpose in any case in any of the courts of the state of Washington and all local governmental entities shall be, on proper showing, entitled to any orders, injunctions, and writs of whatever nature without bond, notwithstanding the provisions of any existing statute requiring that bonds be furnished by private parties.
[ 1993 c 449 s 5.]

Notes:

Purpose—Severability—1993 c 449: See notes following RCW 4.96.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2005–2016 · leading case: Keith L. & Kay Burdine Holmquist & Fredrick Kaseburg v. City Of Seattle, 368 P.3d 234 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Keith L. & Kay Burdine Holmquist & Fredrick Kaseburg v. City Of Seattle, 368 P.3d 234 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “The City filed a notice of *555 supersedeas without bond pursuant to RCW 4.96.050 2 and RAP 8.1(b)(2) and (f).”
Hous. Auth. City of Pasco & Franklin Cty. v. Pleasant, 109 P.3d 422 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “RCW 4.96.050. See RCW 4.96.010(2) (providing that RCW 4.”
Hous. Auth. v. Pleasant, 126 Wash. App. 382 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “RCW 4.96.050. See RCW 4.96.010(2) (providing that RCW 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.