Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 46.04.355 (2026)

Municipal transit vehicle

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Municipal transit vehicle includes every motor vehicle, streetcar, train, trolley vehicle, and any other device, which (1) is capable of being moved within, upon, above, or below a public highway, (2) is owned or operated by a city, county, county transportation authority, public transportation benefit area, regional transit authority, or metropolitan municipal corporation within the state, and (3) is used for the purpose of carrying passengers together with incidental baggage and freight on a regular schedule.

[ 2004 c 118 s 2; 1984 c 167 s 2; 1974 ex.s. c 76 s 4.]

Notes:

Unlawful conduct in a transit vehicle: RCW 9.91.025.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: City of Spokane v. White, 10 P.3d 1095 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Spokane v. White, 10 P.3d 1095 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “In comparison, the state statute provides: A person is guilty of unlawful bus conduct if while on or in a municipal transit vehicle as defined by RCW 46.04.355 or in or at a municipal transit station and with knowledge that such conduct is prohibited, he or she: .”

City of Spokane v. White, 102 Wash. App. 955 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “In comparison, the state statute provides: A person is guilty of unlawful bus conduct if while on or in a municipal transit vehicle as defined by RCW 46.04.355 or in or at a municipal transit station and with knowledge that such conduct is prohibited, he or she: (f)…”

Chan v. Grubhub Holdings Inc (W.D. Wash. 2024). “2 (4) To obstruct or encroach upon public highway, private ways, streets, alleys, commons, landing places, and ways to burying places or to 3 unlawfully obstruct or impede the flow of municipal transit vehicles as defined in RCW 46.04.355 or passenger traffic, access to…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.