Wash. Rev. Code » Title 46 · Chapter 46.08
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 46.08.030 (2026)

Uniformity of application

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The provisions of this title relating to the operation of vehicles shall be applicable and uniform upon all persons operating vehicles upon the public highways of this state, except as otherwise specifically provided.
[ 1961 c 12 s 46.08.030. Prior: 1937 c 189 s 3; RRS s 6360-3.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1975–2003 · leading case: City of Seattle v. Williams, 128 Wash. 2d 341 (Wash. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Seattle v. Williams, 128 Wash. 2d 341 (Wash. 1995). · cites it 14× “020, a statute which requires traffic laws to be "applicable and uniform throughout this state,” as well as RCW 46.08.030, a statute which requires traffic laws to be "applicable and uniform upon all persons operating vehicles upon the pub- *343 lie highways of this state.”
City of Seattle v. Williams, 908 P.2d 359 (Wash. 1995). · cites it 14× “020, a statute which requires traffic laws to be "applicable and uniform throughout this state," as well as RCW 46.08.030, a statute which requires traffic laws to be "applicable and uniform upon all persons operating vehicles upon the public highways of this state.”
HJS Dev., Inc. v. Pierce Cnty., 61 P.3d 1141 (Wash. 2003). · cites it 2× “) *479 RCW 46.08.030 provided: The provisions of this title relating to the operation of vehicles shall be applicable and uniform upon all persons operating vehicles upon the public highways of this state, except as otherwise specifically provided.”
Brewer v. Copeland, 542 P.2d 445 (Wash. 1975). · cites it 2× “She argues (1) it is unreasonable to eliminate rights of action of all guests simply because some may file fraudulent lawsuits; (2) the statute *65 is unconstitutionally over inclusive because it penalizes guests who do not engage in collusion; (3) the statute is…”
City of Seattle v. Wandler, 803 P.2d 833 (Wash. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “020 and RCW 46.08.030 express the Legislature's intent that traffic regulations be absolutely uniform throughout the state and that the Schampera standard should therefore not be applied in this case.”
HJS Dev., Inc. v. Pierce Cnty., 61 P.3d 1141 (Wash. 2003). · cites it 2× “) RCW 46.08.030 provided: The provisions of this title relating to the operation of vehicles shall be applicable and uniform upon all persons operating vehicles upon the public highways of this state, except as otherwise specifically provided.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.