Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 47.26.460 (2026)

Increase in funds allocated to a project—Rules—Factors

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The board shall adopt reasonable rules pursuant to which funds allocated to a project may be increased upon a subsequent application of the county, city, town, or transportation benefit district constructing the project. The rules adopted by the board shall consider the following factors: (1) The financial effect of increasing the original allocation for the project upon other urban arterial projects either approved or requested; (2) whether the project for which an additional authorization is requested can be reduced in scope while retaining a usable segment; (3) whether the cost of the project shown in the original application was based upon reasonable engineering estimates; and (4) whether the requested additional authorization is to pay for an expansion in the scope of work originally approved.

[ 1994 c 179 s 27; 1969 ex.s. c 171 s 7.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1976–1976 · leading case: Cheney v. City of Mountlake Terrace, 552 P.2d 184 (Wash. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cheney v. City of Mountlake Terrace, 552 P.2d 184 (Wash. 1976). · cites it 2× “Upon completion of plans and specifications for the arterial project, the revised cost estimate was furnished to the UAB in February 1975, requesting an additional $50,000 of urban arterial trust funds be granted the project by the UAB as provided for in RCW 47.26.460. The…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.