Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.120 (2025)

Subsequent disapproval

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) If at any time subsequent to the applicable review period provided in RCW 48.19.060 or 48.19.110, the commissioner finds that a filing does not meet the requirements of this chapter, he or she shall, after a hearing, notice of which was given to every insurer and rating organization which made such filing, issue his or her order specifying in what respect he or she finds that such filing fails to meet the requirements of this chapter, and stating when, within a reasonable period thereafter, the filings shall be deemed no longer effective.
(2) Such order shall not affect any contract or policy made or issued prior to the expiration of the period set forth in the order.
(3) Any person aggrieved with respect to any filing then in effect, other than the insurer or rating organization which made the filing, may make written application to the commissioner for a hearing thereon. The application shall specify the grounds to be relied upon by the applicant. If the commissioner finds that the application is made in good faith, that the applicant would be so aggrieved if his or her grounds are established, and that such grounds otherwise justify holding the hearing, he or she shall, within thirty days after receipt of the application, hold a hearing as required in subsection (1) of this section.
[ 2009 c 549 s 7083; 1989 c 25 s 7; 1983 1st ex.s. c 32 s 15; 1947 c 79 s .19.12; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 45.19.12.]

Notes:

Effective date—1989 c 25: See note following RCW 48.18.100.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Blaylock v. First Am. Title Ins., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2007).
Blaylock v. First Am. Title Ins., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 48.19.120(1). Furthermore, the Code anticipates consumer involvement, and provides a mechanism for their input on rate-setting.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.120(1): 1 case
Blaylock v. First Am. Title Ins., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2007). “§ 48.19.120(1). Furthermore, the Code anticipates consumer involvement, and provides a mechanism for their input on rate-setting.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 48.19.120(3): 1 case
Blaylock v. First Am. Title Ins., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2007). “§ 48.19.120(1). Furthermore, the Code anticipates consumer involvement, and provides a mechanism for their input on rate-setting.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.