Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 48.30.150 (2026)
Illegal inducements
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) No insurer, insurance producer, title insurance agent, or other person shall, as an inducement to insurance, or in connection with any insurance transaction, provide in any policy for, or offer, or sell, buy, or offer or promise to buy or give, or promise, or allow to, or on behalf of, the insured or prospective insured in any manner whatsoever:
(a) Any shares of stock or other securities issued or at any time to be issued on any interest therein or rights thereto; or
(b) Any special advisory board contract, or other contract, agreement, or understanding of any kind, offering, providing for, or promising any profits or special returns or special dividends; or
(c) Any prizes, goods, wares, gift cards, gift certificates, or merchandise of an aggregate value in excess of one hundred dollars per person in the aggregate in any consecutive twelve-month period. This subsection (1)(c) does not apply to title insurers or title insurance agents.
(2) Subsection (1) of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit the sale or purchase of securities as a condition to or in connection with surety insurance insuring the performance of an obligation as part of a plan of financing found by the commissioner to be designed and operated in good faith primarily for the purpose of such financing, nor shall it be deemed to prohibit the sale of redeemable securities of a registered investment company in the same transaction in which life insurance is sold.
(3)(a) Subsection (1) of this section shall not be deemed to prohibit a health carrier or disability insurer from including as part of a group or individual health benefit plan or contract providing health benefits, a wellness program which meets the requirements for an exception from the prohibition against discrimination based on a health factor under the health insurance portability and accountability act (P.L. 104-191; 110 Stat. 1936) and regulations adopted pursuant to that act.
(b) For purposes of this subsection: (i) "Health carrier" and "health benefit plan" have the same meaning as provided in RCW 48.43.005; and (ii) "wellness program" has the same meaning as provided in 45 C.F.R. 146.121(f).
(4) Subsection (1) of this section does not prohibit an insurer from issuing any payment to offset documented expenses incurred by a group policyholder in changing coverages from one insurer to another as provided in RCW 48.30.140. If an implementation credit is given to a group, the implementation credit is part of the premium for the purposes of RCW 48.14.020 and 48.14.0201. This exception to subsection (1) of this section does not apply to "medicare supplemental insurance" or "medicare supplemental insurance policies" as defined in chapter 48.66 RCW.
(5) Subsection (4) of this section does not apply to small groups as defined in RCW 48.43.005.
(6) Subsection (1) of this section does not apply to products or services related to any policy of life insurance that are intended to incent behavioral changes that improve the health and reduce the risk of death of the insured.
(7) Subsection (1) of this section does not apply to a performance standard offered or provided in compliance with RCW 48.30.360.
[ 2022 c 13 s 4; 2020 c 197 s 2; 2019 c 253 s 2; 2015 c 272 s 2; 2009 c 329 s 2; 2008 c 217 s 36; 1990 1st ex.s. c 3 s 9; 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 119 s 4; 1957 c 193 s 18; 1947 c 79 s .30.15; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 45.30.15.]
Notes:
Intent—2022 c 13: See note following RCW 48.30.360.
Effective date—2020 c 197: See note following RCW 48.30.140.
Effective date—2019 c 253: See note following RCW 48.30.140.
Severability—Effective date—2008 c 217: See notes following RCW 48.03.020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2013 · leading case: Chicago Title Ins. v. Off. of the Ins. Comm'r, 309 P.3d 372 (Wash. 2013).
Chicago Title Ins. v. Off. of the Ins. Comm'r, 309 P.3d 372 (Wash. 2013). “At the time of the administrative proceedings below, former RCW 48.30.150 (1990) provided that [n]o insurer, general agent, agent, broker, solicitor, or other person shall, as an inducement to insurance, or in connection with any insurance transaction, provide in any policy for,…”
Blaylock v. First Am. Title Ins., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (W.D. Wash. 2007). “” RCW § 48.30.150. The Insurance Commissioner implemented this statute in a regulation entitled “Unfair practices applicable to title insurers and their agents,” which provides, in pertinent part: (1) RCW 48.”
Boucher v. Comm'r, 77 T.C. 214 (Ohio Ct. App. 1981). “No such insurer, general agent, agent, broker, or solicitor shall, following any such revocation, be eligible for a certificate of authority or license within one year after such revocation.”
Chi. Title Ins. Co. v. Off. of Ins. Comm'r (Wash. 2013). “At the time of the administrative proceedings below, former RCW 48.30.150 (1990) provided that [n]o insurer, general agent, agent, broker, solicitor, or other person shall, as an inducement to insurance, or in connection with any insurance transaction, provide in any policy for,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.