Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.30A.045 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Each insurer licensed to write direct insurance in this state, except those exempted in subsection (2) of this section, shall institute and maintain an insurance antifraud plan. An insurer licensed after July 1, 1995, shall file its antifraud plan within six months of licensure. An insurer shall file any change to the antifraud plan with the insurance commissioner within thirty days after the plan has been modified.

(2) This section does not apply to:

(a) Health carriers, as defined in RCW 48.43.005;

(b) Life insurers;

(d) Property or casualty insurers with annual gross written medical malpractice insurance premiums in this state that exceed fifty percent of their total annual gross written premiums in this state;

(e) Credit-related insurance written in connection with a credit transaction in which the creditor is named as a beneficiary or loss payee under the policy, except vendor single-interest or collateral protection coverage as defined in RCW 48.22.110(4); or

(f) Insurers with gross written premiums of less than one thousand dollars in Washington during the reporting year.

[ 2005 c 223 s 20; 1997 c 92 s 1; 1995 c 285 s 9.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2013 · leading case: Tran v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 961 P.2d 358 (Wash. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Tran v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 961 P.2d 358 (Wash. 1998). “[6] The items that Tran refused to provide to State Farm are fully described in the dissent at pages 368 through 369.”

Tran v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 136 Wash. 2d 214 (Wash. 1998). “The items that Tran refused to provide to State Farm are fully described in the dissent at pages 234 through 236.”

Keith v. Allstate Indem. Co., 19 P.3d 1077 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “Keith’s financial condition around the time of the loss was relevant to show whether he had enough assets, not only to make the payments envisioned by the sales contract, but also to pay the estimated $9,000-$12,000 in state licensing fees he would incur once he became the…”

Resident Action Council v. Seattle Hous. Auth. (Wash. 2013). “"Information provided under RCW 48.30A.045 through 48.30A.060" .400(4) 56.”

Herman v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 17 P.3d 631 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “The general rule is that "the relation of an attorney to his client is one of agency...." 7A C.J.S. Attorney & Client § 180, at 282 (1980).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.