Wash. Rev. Code » Title 50 · Chapter 50.32
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 50.32.110 (2026)

Fees for administrative hearings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No individual shall be charged fees of any kind in any proceeding involving the individual's application for initial determination, or claim for waiting period credit, or claim for benefits, under this title by the commissioner or his or her representatives, or by an appeal tribunal, or any court, or any officer thereof. Any individual in any such proceeding before the commissioner or any appeal tribunal may be represented by counsel or other duly authorized agent who shall neither charge nor receive a fee for such services in excess of an amount found reasonable by the officer conducting such proceeding.
[ 2010 c 8 s 13038; 1945 c 35 s 127; Rem. Supp. 1945 s 9998-265.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1969–2015 · leading case: Ancheta v. Daly, 461 P.2d 531 (Wash. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ancheta v. Daly, 461 P.2d 531 (Wash. 1969). “100 17 and RCW 50.32.110. 18 In RCW 50.32.100, it is specifically provided that “fees and all costs .”
Michaelson v. Emp. Sec. Dep't, 187 Wash. App. 293 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “010(6) allows a prevailing party to recover statutory attorney fees. Under RCW 50.”
Albertson's, Inc. v. Emp. Sec. Dep't, 102 Wash. App. 29 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “100 and RCW 50.32.110, 34 is “to provide for regulation of attorney fees incurred in relation to administrative *47 or court proceedings.”
Martin Michaelson v. Dept. of Emp. Sec. (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “Oep't claimants are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs if the decision of the commissioner is reversed or modified on appeal.”
Martin Michaelson v. Dept. Of Emp. Sec. (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “Dep't claimants are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs if the decision of the commissioner is reversed or modified on appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.