Wash. Rev. Code » Title 58 · Chapter 58.17
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 58.17.030 (2026)

Subdivisions to comply with chapter, local regulations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Every subdivision shall comply with the provisions of this chapter. Every short subdivision as defined in this chapter shall comply with the provisions of any local regulation adopted pursuant to RCW 58.17.060.
[ 1974 ex.s. c 134 s 1; 1969 ex.s. c 271 s 3.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case: HJS Dev., Inc. v. Pierce Cnty., 61 P.3d 1141 (Wash. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
HJS Dev., Inc. v. Pierce Cnty., 61 P.3d 1141 (Wash. 2003). · cites it 2× “See RCW 58.17.030, .070. RCW 58.17.020(4). RCW 58.”
Hornback v. Wentworth, 132 Wash. App. 504 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 58.17.030. ¶14 Applicable here is section 34 of Grant County’s short plat and short subdivision ordinance.”
Harrison v. Stevens Cnty., 61 P.3d 1202 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “RCW 58.17.030, .060. Former Stevens County short platting ordinance 64-1971 (as amended by ordinance 01-1974) required the signature on the short plat application of all parties having any interest in the land to be subdivided.”
Gilmore v. Hershaw, 521 P.2d 934 (Wash. 1974). “RCW 58.17.030 provides that every subdivision of land *705 shall comply with the provisions of RCW 58.”
Hornback v. Wentworth, 132 P.3d 778 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 58.17.030. ¶ 14 Applicable here is Section 34 of Grant County's short plat and short subdivision ordinance.”
Bunnell v. Blair, 132 Wash. App. 149 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 58.17.030 states, “Every short subdivision as defined in this chapter shall comply with the provisions of any local regulation adopted pursuant to RCW 58.”
Bunnell v. Blair, 130 P.3d 423 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 58.17.030 states, "Every short subdivision as defined in this chapter shall comply with the provisions of any local regulation adopted pursuant to RCW 58.”
Dean v. Gregg, 663 P.2d 502 (Wash. Ct. App. 1983). “” RCW 58.17.030. We note that section 17.03.”
HJS Dev., Inc. v. Pierce Cnty., 61 P.3d 1141 (Wash. 2003). · cites it 2× “[68] See RCW 58.17.030, .070. [69] RCW 58.17.020(4).”
Toulouse v. Bd. of Commissioners, 949 P.2d 829 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “040(3), however, “[d]ivisions made by testamentary provisions, or the laws of descent” are exempt from this requirement. In Telfer, we held that this means that undivided property received under the residuary clause of a will may be divided among the devisees into separate…”
Marc R. Keith v. Ferry Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “RCW 58.17.030 provides that “[e]very short subdivision as defined in this chapter shall comply with the provisions of any local regulation adopted pursuant to 13 No.”
Cape George Land Co., Llc, Apps V. Jefferson Cnty., Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “The statute defines a “subdivision” as “the division or redivision of land into five or more lots, tracts, parcels, sites, or divisions for the purpose of sale, lease, or transfer of ownership, except [a short subdivision].” RCW 58.17.020(17).”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.