Wash. Rev. Code » Title 6 · Chapter 6.17
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 6.17.090 (2025)

Property liable to execution

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
All property, real and personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.
[ 1987 c 442 s 409; 1929 c 25 s 6; RRS s 518. Prior: Code 1881 s 333; 1877 p 70 s 337; 1854 p 177 s 251. Formerly RCW 6.04.060.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton, 766 F.3d 991 (9th Cir. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton, 766 F.3d 991 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “” Wash. Rev. Code § 6.17.090 . Washington law does not specifically address whether copyrights, like other types of property, are subject to sale or assignment in order to satisfy a judgment, but federal law establishes that copyrights are alienable.”
DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaft Bank v. Meyer, 869 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 2017). “See Wash. Rev. Code § 6.17.090 (“All property, real and personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.”
MP Med. Inc. v. Wegman, 213 P.3d 931 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “Wegman contends that levying on MP Medical's appeal is authorized by RCW 6.17.090, which broadly provides that "[a]ll property, real and personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.”
Ikuno v. Yip, 912 F.2d 306 (9th Cir. 1990). “In 1987, this statute was recodified as Wash. Rev.Code Ann. § 6.17.090. . Although a claim may not be subject to execution if it is not capable of being rendered certain upon judgment, United Pacific Insurance Co.”
MP Med. Inc. v. Wegman, 151 Wash. App. 409 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “Wegman contends that levying on MP Medical’s appeal is authorized by RCW 6.17.090, which broadly provides that “[a]ll property, real and personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.”
Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Urberg, No. 2:21-cv-01287 (W.D. Wash. Mar. 1, 2023). · cites it 2× “See RCW 6.17.090 (property liable to execution); Woody’s 14 Olympia Lumber, Inc.”
Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton, No. 13-35010 (9th Cir. June 23, 2014). · cites it 2× “” Wash. Rev. Code § 6.17.090 . Washington law does not specifically address whether copyrights, like other types of property, are subject to sale or assignment in order to satisfy a judgment, but federal law establishes that copyrights are alienable.”
Dz Bank Ag Deutsche Zentral v. Louis Meyer, No. 15-35086 (9th Cir. July 11, 2017). “Wash. Rev. Code § 6.17.090 (“All property, real and personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.”
Clark Equip. Co. v. Walls, No. 3:21-cv-05886 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2024). “Specifically, Washington Revised Code § 6.17.090 provides that “[a]ll property, real and 6 personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.”
Clark Equip. Co. v. Walls, No. 3:21-cv-05886 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 14, 2025). “Specifically, Washington Revised Code § 6.17.090 provides that “[a]ll property, real and 15 personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.”
Cristina P. Anderson, V. Farmers Ins. Co. Of Washington, 578 P.3d 341 (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “1990); see RCW 6.17.090 (“All property, real and personal, of the judgment debtor that is not exempted by law is liable to execution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.