Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 64.04.060 (2025)
Word "heirs" unnecessary
✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The term "heirs", or other technical words of inheritance, shall not be necessary to create and convey an estate in fee simple. All conveyances heretofore made omitting the word "heirs", or other technical words of inheritance, but not limiting the estate conveyed, are hereby validated as and are declared to be conveyances of an estate in fee simple.
[ 1931 c 20 s 1; RRS s 10558. Prior: 1888 p 51 s 4.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1959–1982 · leading case: Nelson v. Bailey, 338 P.2d 757 (Wash. 1959).
Nelson v. Bailey, 338 P.2d 757 (Wash. 1959). “RCW 64.04.060; Everly v. Wold, 125 Wash. 467 , 217 Pac.”
In re Est. of Griffen, 543 P.2d 245 (Wash. 1975). “1 In this state, the pertinent statute is RCW 64.04.060 (Laws of 1931, ch. 20, § 1, based on Laws of 1888, § 4, p.”
In re the Est. of Taylor, 646 P.2d 776 (Wash. Ct. App. 1982). “RCW 64.04.060 eliminates the need for such words, but is itself a rule of construction: "The term 'heirs', or other technical words of inheritance, shall not be necessary to create and convey an estate in fee simple.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.