Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.342 (2026)
State liquor and cannabis board—Rules
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) For the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of chapter 3, Laws of 2013 according to their true intent or of supplying any deficiency therein, the board may adopt rules not inconsistent with the spirit of chapter 3, Laws of 2013 as are deemed necessary or advisable. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, the board is empowered to adopt rules regarding the following:
(a) The equipment and management of retail outlets and premises where cannabis is produced or processed, and inspection of the retail outlets and premises where cannabis is produced or processed;
(b) The books and records to be created and maintained by licensees, the reports to be made thereon to the board, and inspection of the books and records;
(c) Methods of producing, processing, and packaging cannabis, useable cannabis, cannabis concentrates, and cannabis-infused products; conditions of sanitation; safe handling requirements; approved pesticides and pesticide testing requirements; and standards of ingredients, quality, and identity of cannabis, useable cannabis, cannabis concentrates, and cannabis-infused products produced, processed, packaged, or sold by licensees;
(d) Security requirements for retail outlets and premises where cannabis is produced or processed, and safety protocols for licensees and their employees;
(e) Screening, hiring, training, and supervising employees of licensees;
(f) Retail outlet locations and hours of operation;
(g) Labeling requirements and restrictions on advertisement of cannabis, useable cannabis, cannabis concentrates, cannabis health and beauty aids, and cannabis-infused products for sale in retail outlets;
(h) Forms to be used for purposes of this chapter and chapter 69.51A RCW or the rules adopted to implement and enforce these chapters, the terms and conditions to be contained in licenses issued under this chapter and chapter 69.51A RCW, and the qualifications for receiving a license issued under this chapter and chapter 69.51A RCW, including a criminal history record information check. The board may submit any criminal history record information check to the Washington state patrol and to the identification division of the federal bureau of investigation in order that these agencies may search their records for prior arrests and convictions of the individual or individuals who filled out the forms. The board must require fingerprinting of any applicant whose criminal history record information check is submitted to the federal bureau of investigation;
(i) Application, reinstatement, and renewal fees for licenses issued under this chapter and chapter 69.51A RCW, and fees for anything done or permitted to be done under the rules adopted to implement and enforce this chapter and chapter 69.51A RCW;
(j) The manner of giving and serving notices required by this chapter and chapter 69.51A RCW or rules adopted to implement or enforce these chapters;
(k) Times and periods when, and the manner, methods, and means by which, licensees transport and deliver cannabis, cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, and cannabis-infused products within the state;
(l) Identification, seizure, confiscation, destruction, or donation to law enforcement for training purposes of all cannabis, cannabis concentrates, useable cannabis, and cannabis-infused products produced, processed, sold, or offered for sale within this state which do not conform in all respects to the standards prescribed by this chapter or chapter 69.51A RCW or the rules adopted to implement and enforce these chapters;
(m) The prohibition of any type of device used in conjunction with a cannabis vapor product and the prohibition of the use of any type of additive, solvent, ingredient, or compound in the production and processing of cannabis products, including cannabis vapor products, when the board determines, following consultation with the department of health or any other authority the board deems appropriate, that the device, additive, solvent, ingredient, or compound may pose a risk to public health or youth access; and
(n) Requirements for processors to submit under oath to the department of health a complete list of all constituent substances and the amount and sources thereof in each cannabis vapor product, including all additives, thickening agents, preservatives, compounds, and any other substance used in the production and processing of each cannabis vapor product.
(2) Rules adopted on retail outlets holding medical cannabis endorsements must be adopted in coordination and consultation with the department.
(3) The board must adopt rules to perfect and expand existing programs for compliance education for licensed cannabis businesses and their employees. The rules must include a voluntary compliance program created in consultation with licensed cannabis businesses and their employees. The voluntary compliance program must include recommendations on abating violations of this chapter and rules adopted under this chapter.
[ 2022 c 16 s 63; 2020 c 133 s 3; 2019 c 394 s 4; 2015 2nd sp.s. c 4 s 1601; 2015 c 70 s 7; 2013 c 3 s 9 (Initiative Measure No. 502, approved November 6, 2012).]
Notes:
Intent—Finding—2022 c 16: See note following RCW 69.50.101.
Findings—2025 c 58; 2020 c 133: "The legislature finds that recent reports of lung illnesses associated with vapor products demand serious attention by the state in the interest of protecting public health and preventing youth access. While state law grants the liquor and cannabis board broad authority to regulate vapor products containing cannabis, the legislature finds that risks to public health and youth access can be mitigated by clarifying that the board is granted specific authority to prohibit the use of any additive, solvent, ingredient, or compound in cannabis vapor product production and processing and to prohibit any device used in conjunction with a cannabis vapor product." [ 2025 c 58 s 4008; 2020 c 133 s 1.]
Effective date—2020 c 133: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [March 25, 2020]." [ 2020 c 133 s 5.]
Findings—2019 c 394: See note following RCW 69.50.563.
Findings—Intent—Effective dates—2015 2nd sp.s. c 4: See notes following RCW 69.50.334.
Short title—Findings—Intent—References to Washington state liquor control board—Draft legislation—2015 c 70: See notes following RCW 66.08.012.
Intent—2013 c 3 (Initiative Measure No. 502): See note following RCW 69.50.101.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2021 · leading case: Emerald Enter. & John Larson v. Clark Cnty., 413 P.3d 92 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).
Emerald Enter. & John Larson v. Clark Cnty., 413 P.3d 92 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “See RCW 69.50.342, .354. The legislature promulgated the section of the UCSA at issue to reallocate law enforcement resources, generate tax revenue, and create an alternative to the illegal drug market.”
Raz Yaron, V. Sierra Conley, 488 P.3d 855 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “325 (regulating the distinct licenses for marijuana producers, processors, and retailers); RCW 69.50.342 (providing LCB the authority to adopt rules consistent with the statutory scheme’s spirit); RCW 69.”
Libby Haines-marchel, Et Ano, App v. Wa State Liquor & Cannabis Bd., Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “WAC 314-55-035 and -040 are within the scope and intent of Initiative Measure 502, which gave the Board broad authority to take marijuana out of the hands of criminals and bring marijuana under a tightly regulated, state-licensed system, and RCW 69.”
Top Cat Enter. v. Wa State Liquor & Cannibis Bd. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “RCW 69.50.342(1)(f). In response, WSLCB promulgated WAC 314-55-050(1 0), which states: the [WSLCB] shall not issue a new marijuana license if the proposed licensed business is within one thousand feet of the perimeter of the grounds of any of the following entities.”
King v. Rushford (W.D. Wash. 2021). “# 28 at 2; 22 RCW 69.50.342. Plaintiffs allege that LCB officers cannot enforce criminal cannabis 23 statutes because Washington state law limits the authority of LCB peace officers to the 24 enforcement of liquor statutes.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.342(1) — 2 cases
Raz Yaron, V. Sierra Conley, 488 P.3d 855 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “325 (regulating the distinct licenses for marijuana producers, processors, and retailers); RCW 69.50.342 (providing LCB the authority to adopt rules consistent with the statutory scheme’s spirit); RCW 69.”
Libby Haines-marchel, Et Ano, App v. Wa State Liquor & Cannabis Bd., Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “WAC 314-55-035 and -040 are within the scope and intent of Initiative Measure 502, which gave the Board broad authority to take marijuana out of the hands of criminals and bring marijuana under a tightly regulated, state-licensed system, and RCW 69.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.342(1)(f) — 2 cases
Emerald Enter. & John Larson v. Clark Cnty., 413 P.3d 92 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “See RCW 69.50.342, .354. The legislature promulgated the section of the UCSA at issue to reallocate law enforcement resources, generate tax revenue, and create an alternative to the illegal drug market.”
Top Cat Enter. v. Wa State Liquor & Cannibis Bd. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “RCW 69.50.342(1)(f). In response, WSLCB promulgated WAC 314-55-050(1 0), which states: the [WSLCB] shall not issue a new marijuana license if the proposed licensed business is within one thousand feet of the perimeter of the grounds of any of the following entities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.