Wash. Rev. Code » Title 69 · Chapter 69.50
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.4015 (2025)

Involving a person under eighteen in unlawful controlled substance transaction—Penalty

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) It is unlawful to compensate, threaten, solicit, or in any other manner involve a person under the age of eighteen years in a transaction unlawfully to manufacture, sell, or deliver a controlled substance.
(2) A violation of this section is a class C felony punishable according to chapter 9A.20 RCW.
[ 2003 c 53 s 336.]

Notes:

Intent—Effective date—2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2016 · leading case: State v. Flores, 164 Wash. 2d 1 (2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Flores, 164 Wash. 2d 1 (2008). · cites it 3× “Accordingly, we reverse his convictions on those charges for insufficient evidence. But we affirm the other convictions, agreeing with the Court of Appeals that the confrontation clause violation was harmless.”
State v. Flores, 186 P.3d 1038 (Wash. 2008). · cites it 3× “Accordingly, we reverse his convictions on those charges for insufficient evidence. But we affirm the other convictions, agreeing with the Court of Appeals that the confrontation clause violation was harmless.”
State of Washington v. Arturo Luna Huerta, No. 31501-1 (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2016). · cites it 2× “We agree that proximity to the transaction alone does not establish the crime. We disagree with Huerta's argument of insufficient evidence, however.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.4015(1): 1 case
State of Washington v. Arturo Luna Huerta, No. 31501-1 (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2016). “We agree that proximity to the transaction alone does not establish the crime. We disagree with Huerta's argument of insufficient evidence, however.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.