Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.16
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.16.360 (2026)

Inapplicability to action reviewable under Administrative Procedure Act or Land Use Petition Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter does not apply to state agency action reviewable under chapter 34.05 RCW or to land use decisions of local jurisdictions reviewable under chapter 36.70C RCW.
[ 1995 c 347 s 716; 1989 c 175 s 38.]

Notes:

Finding—Severability—Part headings and table of contents not law—1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.
Effective date—1989 c 175: See note following RCW 34.05.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1997–2012 · leading case: Spokane Cnty. v. State, 966 P.2d 305 (Wash. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Spokane Cnty. v. State, 966 P.2d 305 (Wash. 1998). · cites it 7× “In support of its arguments, PERC relies on RCW 7.16.360, which states: “This chapter [certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition] does not apply to state agency action reviewable under chapter 34.”
Hillis v. Dep't of Ecology, 131 Wash. 2d 373 (Wash. 1997). · cites it 2× “RCW 7.16.360. Instead of a writ, an order requiring performance should have issued pursuant to RCW 34.”
Hillis v. State, Dept. of Ecology, 932 P.2d 139 (Wash. 1997). · cites it 2× “RCW 7.16.360. Instead of a writ, an order requiring performance should have issued pursuant to RCW 34.”
Spokane Co. v. State Ex Rel. Co. Comrs., 966 P.2d 305 (Wash. 1998). · cites it 7× “In support of its arguments, PERC relies on RCW 7.16.360, which states: "This chapter [certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition] does not apply to state agency action reviewable under chapter 34.”
Evergreen Washington Healthcare Frontier, LLC v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 287 P.3d 40 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “RCW 7.16.360 (writs of mandamus and certiorari); RCW 7.”
Crosby v. Cnty. of Spokane, 971 P.2d 32 (Wash. 1999). “See RCW 7.16.360 (chapter not applicable to agency determinations reviewable under RCW 34.”
Larsen v. Town of Colton, 973 P.2d 1066 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). “030(l)(b); but see RCW 7.16.360. 4 RCW 36.700.040(4) defines the date of issuance as: “(a) Three days after a written decision is mailed by the local jurisdiction or, if not mailed, the date on which the local jurisdiction provides notice that a written decision is publicly…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.