Wash. Rev. Code » Title 70 · Chapter 70.122
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 70.122.070 (2026)

Effects of carrying out directive—Insurance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from a qualified patient pursuant to the patient's directive in accordance with the provisions of this chapter shall not, for any purpose, constitute a suicide or a homicide.
(2) The making of a directive pursuant to RCW 70.122.030 shall not restrict, inhibit, or impair in any manner the sale, procurement, or issuance of any policy of life insurance, nor shall it be deemed to modify the terms of an existing policy of life insurance. No policy of life insurance shall be legally impaired or invalidated in any manner by the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from an insured qualified patient, notwithstanding any term of the policy to the contrary.
(3) No physician, health facility, or other health provider, and no health care service plan, insurer issuing disability insurance, self-insured employee welfare benefit plan, or nonprofit hospital service plan, shall require any person to execute a directive as a condition for being insured for, or receiving, health care services.
[ 1992 c 98 s 7; 1979 c 112 s 8.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1983–1997 · leading case: Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997). · cites it 4× “" Wash. Rev. Code § 70.122.070 (1). [2] Petitioners in this case are the State of Washington and its Attorney General.”
In Re the Welfare of Colyer, 660 P.2d 738 (Wash. 1983). · cites it 2× “*139 VII As a concluding note, the limitations of this opinion will be delineated.”
Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997). “19, §§ 198(a), (g) (1995); Wash. Rev. Code §§ 70.122.070 (1), 70.122.”
Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997). “19, §§ 198(a), (g) (1995); Wash. Rev. Code §§ 70.122.070 (1), 70.122.”
Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997). “19, §§ 198(a), (g) (1995); Wash. Rev. Code §§ 70.122.070 (1), 70.122.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.