Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 74.13.290 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) To provide stability to children in out-of-home care, placement selection shall be made with a view toward the fewest possible placements for each child. If possible, the initial placement shall be viewed as the only placement for the child. Pursuant to RCW 13.34.060 and 13.34.130, placement of the child with a relative or other suitable person is the preferred option. The use of short-term interim placements of thirty days or less to protect the child's health or safety while the placement of choice is being arranged is not a violation of this principle.
(2) If a child has been previously placed in out-of-home care and is subsequently returned to out-of-home care, and the department cannot locate an appropriate and available relative or other suitable person, the preferred placement for the child is in a foster family home where the child previously was placed, if the following conditions are met:
(a) The foster family home is available and willing to care for the child;
(b) The foster family is appropriate and able to meet the child's needs; and
(c) The placement is in the best interest of the child.
[ 2009 c 482 s 1; 1990 c 284 s 11.]

Notes:

FindingEffective date1990 c 284: See notes following RCW 74.13.250.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2002 · leading case: In re the Dependency of J.S., 111 Wash. App. 796 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002).
In re the Dependency of J.S., 111 Wash. App. 796 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “See also RCW 74.13.290, .310; In re Dependency of J.”
In Re Dependency of JS, 46 P.3d 273 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “See also RCW 74.13.290, .310; In re J.H., 117 Wash.”
Schwebke v. Lutheran Soc. Servs., 815 P.2d 1380 (Wash. 1991). “" RCW 74.13.290. While the child may benefit from these enactments, neither these statutes, nor others in effect at the time this action was initiated, grant foster parents a right to challenge arbitrary removal of children in foster care.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.