Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 76.09.205 (2025)
Appeals board review
✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A person aggrieved by the approval or disapproval of an application to conduct a forest practice or the approval or disapproval of any landscape plan or permit or watershed analysis may seek review from the appeals board by filing a request for the same within thirty days from the date of receipt of the decision. Concurrently with the filing of any request for review with the appeals board as provided in this section, the requestor must file a copy of his or her request with the department and the attorney general. The attorney general may intervene to protect the public interest and ensure that the provisions of this chapter are complied with.
[ 2010 c 210 s 24.]
Notes:
Intent—Effective dates—Application—Pending cases and rules—2010 c 210: See notes following RCW 43.21B.001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: Simon's Way Dev., Inc v. Clark Cnty., No. 53723-1 (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2021).
Simon's Way Dev., Inc v. Clark Cnty., No. 53723-1 (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2021). “RCW 76.09.205. RCW 76.09.020(2) defines “appeals board” as the PCHB.”
Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cnty. v. State, 562 P.3d 343 (Wash. 2025). “However, DNR’s interpretation of the regulations is subject to timely appeal. The act provides a 30-day period when parties 11 Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.