Wash. Rev. Code » Title 77 · Chapter 77.32
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 77.32.350 (2026)

Migratory birds—Supplemental permit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In addition to a small game hunting license, a supplemental migratory bird permit is required to hunt for migratory birds.
The migratory bird permit is required for all persons 16 years of age or older. Furthermore, a migratory bird authorization is required for all persons to hunt band-tailed pigeon, brant, sea duck, snow goose, and southwest Canada goose.
[ 2025 c 328 s 5; 2011 c 339 s 7; 2009 c 333 s 72; 2002 c 283 s 1; 2000 c 107 s 270; 1998 c 191 s 25; 1998 c 191 s 24; 1992 c 41 s 1; 1991 sp.s. c 7 s 9; 1990 c 84 s 6; 1989 c 365 s 1; 1987 c 506 s 105. Prior: 1985 c 464 s 9; 1985 c 243 s 1; 1984 c 240 s 6; 1981 c 310 s 12.]

Notes:

Effective date—2025 c 328: See note following RCW 77.08.010.
Effective date—2011 c 339: See note following RCW 43.84.092.
Effective date—1998 c 191: See note following RCW 77.32.410.
Effective date—1992 c 41: "This act shall take effect January 1, 1993. The director of wildlife may take steps necessary to ensure that this act is implemented on its effective date." [ 1992 c 41 s 2.]
Effective date—1991 sp.s. c 7: See note following RCW 77.65.450.
Legislative findings and intent—1987 c 506: See note following RCW 77.04.020.
Effective date—1985 c 464: See note following RCW 77.65.450.
Effective dates—Legislative intent—1981 c 310: See notes following RCW 77.12.170.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–2012 · leading case: State v. Essex, 788 P.2d 589 (Wash. Ct. App. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Essex, 788 P.2d 589 (Wash. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 3× “He argues the statute, RCW 77.32.350, does not require anyone but the owner of the dog to purchase a hound stamp, which he had done.”
Schwartz v. Elerding, 270 P.3d 630 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “042(1)-(4), (7); and see, e.g., former RCW 77.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 77.32.350(3) — 1 case
Schwartz v. Elerding, 270 P.3d 630 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “042(1)-(4), (7); and see, e.g., former RCW 77.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.