Wash. Rev. Code » Title 80 · Chapter 80.04
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 80.04.200 (2025)

Rehearing before commission

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any public service company affected by any order of the commission, and deeming itself aggrieved, may, after the expiration of two years from the date of such order taking effect, petition the commission for a rehearing upon the matters involved in such order, setting forth in such petition the grounds and reasons for such rehearing, which grounds and reasons may comprise and consist of changed conditions since the issuance of such order, or by showing a result injuriously affecting the petitioner which was not considered or anticipated at the former hearing, or that the effect of such order has been such as was not contemplated by the commission or the petitioner, or for any good and sufficient cause which for any reason was not considered and determined in such former hearing. Upon the filing of such petition, such proceedings shall be had thereon as are provided for hearings upon complaint, and such orders may be reviewed as are other orders of the commission: PROVIDED, That no order superseding the order of the commission denying such rehearing shall be granted by the court pending the review. In case any order of the commission shall not be reviewed, but shall be complied with by the public service company, such petition for rehearing may be filed within six months from and after the date of the taking effect of such order, and the proceedings thereon shall be as in this section provided. The commission, may, in its discretion, permit the filing of a petition for rehearing at any time. No order of the commission upon a rehearing shall affect any right of action or penalty accruing under the original order unless so ordered by the commission.
[ 1961 c 14 s 80.04.200. Prior: 1911 c 117 s 89; RRS s 10431.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2010 · leading case: US West Commc'ns, Inc. v. Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 949 P.2d 1337 (Wash. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
US West Commc'ns, Inc. v. Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 949 P.2d 1337 (Wash. 1997). · cites it 4× “RCW 80.04.200 provides in relevant part: Any public service company affected by any order of the commission, and deeming itself aggrieved, may, after the expiration of two years from the date of such order taking effect, petition the commission for a rehearing upon the matters…”
Suquamish Tribe v. Cent. Puget Sound Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 156 Wash. App. 743 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Our Supreme Court noted that, under RCW 80.04.200, the rate case did not require a *778 rehearing about depreciation where the Commission issued its depreciation case decision only months before hearing the US West rate case.”
US West v. Utils. & Transp. Com'n, 949 P.2d 1337 (Wash. 1998). · cites it 4× “RCW 80.04.200 provides in relevant part: Any public service company affected by any order of the commission, and deeming itself aggrieved, may, after the expiration of two years from the date of such order taking effect, petition the commission for a rehearing upon the matters…”
Suquamish Tribe v. Cent. PUGET SOUND, 235 P.3d 812 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “Our Supreme Court noted that, under RCW 80.04.200, the rate case did not require a rehearing about depreciation where the Commission issued its depreciation case decision only months before hearing the US West rate case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.