Wash. Rev. Code » Title 80 · Chapter 80.36
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 80.36.510 (2026)

Legislative finding

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The legislature finds that a growing number of companies provide, in a nonresidential setting, telecommunications services necessary to long distance service without disclosing the services provided or the rate, charge or fee. The legislature finds that provision of these services without disclosure to consumers is a deceptive trade practice.
[ 1988 c 91 s 1.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2004 · leading case: Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 95 P.3d 337 (Wash. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 95 P.3d 337 (Wash. 2004). · cites it 40× “According to Judd, the legislature provided a cause of action to address this lack of disclosure in RCW 80.36.510. Judd also purports to challenge the validity of certain exemptions or waivers provided in the disclosure regulations that the Washington Utilities and…”
Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 152 Wash. 2d 195 (Wash. 2004). · cites it 40× “According to Judd, the legislature provided a cause of action to address this lack of disclosure in RCW 80.36.510. Judd also purports to challenge the validity of certain exemptions or waivers provided in the disclosure regulations that the Washington Utilities and…”
Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 116 Wash. App. 761 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 16× “First, the court concluded that the alternate operator services disclosure statutes (RCW 80.36.510, .520, .524, .530) and the WUTC regulations created thereunder set forth a cause of action under the CPA only for violations of the regulations promulgated in response to the…”
Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 66 P.3d 1102 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 16× “First, the court concluded that the alternate operator services disclosure statutes (RCW 80.36.510, .520, .524, and .530) and the WUTC regulations created thereunder set forth a cause of action under the CPA only for violations of the regulations promulgated in response to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.