Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 80.36.524 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commission may adopt rules that provide for minimum service levels for telecommunications companies providing alternate operator services. The rules may provide a means for suspending the registration of a company providing alternate operator services if the company fails to meet minimum service levels or if the company fails to provide appropriate disclosure to consumers of the protection afforded under this chapter.

[ 1990 c 247 s 3.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2003 · leading case: Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 116 Wash. App. 761 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 116 Wash. App. 761 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “Further, RCW 80.36.524 sets forth that the WUTC may adopt rules providing for the minimum service levels for telecommunications companies providing alternate operator services.”

Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 66 P.3d 1102 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “Further, RCW 80.36.524 sets forth that the WUTC may adopt rules providing for the minimum service levels for telecommunications companies providing alternate operator services.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.