Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 80.50.040 (2025)

Energy facility site evaluation council—Powers enumerated

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The council shall have the following powers:
(1) To adopt, promulgate, amend, or rescind suitable rules and regulations, pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW, to carry out the provisions of this chapter, and the policies and practices of the council in connection therewith;
(2) To develop and apply environmental and ecological guidelines in relation to the type, design, location, construction, initial operational conditions of certification, and ongoing regulatory oversight under the regulatory authority established in this chapter of energy facilities subject to this chapter;
(3) To establish rules of practice for the conduct of public hearings pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, as found in chapter 34.05 RCW;
(4) To prescribe the form, content, and necessary supporting documentation for site certification;
(5) To receive applications for energy facility locations and to investigate the sufficiency thereof;
(6) To enter into contracts to carry out the provisions of this chapter;
(7) To conduct hearings on the proposed location and operational conditions of the energy facilities under the regulatory authority established in this chapter;
(8) To prepare written reports to the governor which shall include: (a) A statement indicating whether the application is in compliance with the council's guidelines, (b) criteria specific to the site and transmission line routing, (c) a council recommendation as to the disposition of the application, and (d) a draft certification agreement when the council recommends approval of the application;
(9) To prescribe the means for monitoring of the effects arising from the construction and the operation of energy facilities to assure continued compliance with terms of certification and/or permits issued by the council pursuant to chapter 90.48 RCW or subsection (12) of this section: PROVIDED, That any on-site inspection required by the council shall be performed by other state agencies pursuant to interagency agreement: PROVIDED FURTHER, That the council may retain authority for determining compliance relative to monitoring;
(10) To integrate its site evaluation activity with activities of federal agencies having jurisdiction in such matters to avoid unnecessary duplication;
(11) To present state concerns and interests to other states, regional organizations, and the federal government on the location, construction, and operation of any energy facility which may affect the environment, health, or safety of the citizens of the state of Washington;
(12) To issue permits in compliance with applicable provisions of the federally approved state implementation plan adopted in accordance with the Federal Clean Air Act, as now existing or hereafter amended, for the new construction, reconstruction, or enlargement or operation of energy facilities: PROVIDED, That such permits shall become effective only if the governor approves an application for certification and executes a certification agreement pursuant to this chapter: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That all such permits be conditioned upon compliance with all provisions of the federally approved state implementation plan which apply to energy facilities covered within the provisions of this chapter; and
(13) To serve as an interagency coordinating body for energy-related issues.
[ 2022 c 183 s 5; 2001 c 214 s 6; 1990 c 12 s 4; 1985 c 67 s 2; 1979 ex.s. c 254 s 1; 1977 ex.s. c 371 s 4; 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 108 s 32; 1970 ex.s. c 45 s 4.]

Notes:

Effective date—2022 c 183: See note following RCW 80.50.010.
Severability—Effective date—2001 c 214: See notes following RCW 80.50.010.
Findings—2001 c 214: See note following RCW 39.35.010.
Effective date—1990 c 12: See note following RCW 80.50.030.
Severability—Effective date—1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 108: See notes following RCW 43.21F.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1999–2015 · leading case: Residents Opposed Turbines v. State Efsec, 197 P.3d 1153 (Wash. 2008).
Residents Opposed Turbines v. State Efsec, 197 P.3d 1153 (Wash. 2008). · cites it 2× “RCW 80.50.040(2), (5), .071. ¶ 7 EFSLA expressly preempts energy facility certification decisions by other governmental entities.”
Concerned Ratepayers Ass'n v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 983 P.2d 635 (Wash. 1999). · cites it 2× “RCW 80.50.040 enumerates the Council’s various powers, including the authority to investigate, prepare *954 reports, certify, and issue permits relating to proposed energy plants.”
Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, 165 Wash. 2d 275 (2008). “RCW 80.50.040(2), (5), .071. ¶8 EFSLA expressly preempts energy facility certification decisions by other governmental entities.”
Columbia Riverkeeper v. Port Of Vancouver, 357 P.3d 710 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “RCW 80.50.040, .060(1). The Council receives, processes, and evaluates applications for site certification under EFSLA and the regulations and guidelines it adopts.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, 310 P.3d 780 (Wash. 2013). “To obtain the estimates, WREP’s consultant used its daytime observations to develop an index number that was compared with other already existing sites. Based on this index, postconstruction fatality numbers at other sites, and a regression analysis, the consultant estimated a…”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, No. 88089-1 (Wash. Aug. 29, 2013). “11 RCW 80.50.040(9) (requiring compliance with water pollution controls under chapter 90.”
Lathrop v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, 121 P.3d 774 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 80.50.040(7), (8). While EFSEC may recommend preemption, solely the governor has the power to preempt land use plans under the statutory scheme.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 80.50.040(2): 2 cases
Residents Opposed Turbines v. State Efsec, 197 P.3d 1153 (Wash. 2008). “RCW 80.50.040(2), (5), .071. ¶ 7 EFSLA expressly preempts energy facility certification decisions by other governmental entities.”
Residents Opposed to Kittitas Turbines v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, 165 Wash. 2d 275 (2008). “RCW 80.50.040(2), (5), .071. ¶8 EFSLA expressly preempts energy facility certification decisions by other governmental entities.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 80.50.040(5): 1 case
Columbia Riverkeeper v. Port Of Vancouver, 357 P.3d 710 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “RCW 80.50.040, .060(1). The Council receives, processes, and evaluates applications for site certification under EFSLA and the regulations and guidelines it adopts.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 80.50.040(7): 1 case
Lathrop v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, 121 P.3d 774 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 80.50.040(7), (8). While EFSEC may recommend preemption, solely the governor has the power to preempt land use plans under the statutory scheme.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 80.50.040(9): 2 cases
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, 310 P.3d 780 (Wash. 2013). “To obtain the estimates, WREP’s consultant used its daytime observations to develop an index number that was compared with other already existing sites. Based on this index, postconstruction fatality numbers at other sites, and a regression analysis, the consultant estimated a…”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, No. 88089-1 (Wash. Aug. 29, 2013). “11 RCW 80.50.040(9) (requiring compliance with water pollution controls under chapter 90.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.