Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 82.03.160 (2025)
Appeals to board—Formal hearings, powers of board or tax referees—Assistance
✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In all appeals involving a formal hearing before the board or any of its members or tax referees, the board, any member of the board, and the board's tax referees have all powers relating to administration of oaths, issuance of subpoenas, and taking of depositions as are granted to agencies in chapter 34.05 RCW; and the board, and each member thereof, or its tax referees, are subject to all duties imposed upon, and have all powers granted to, an agency by those provisions of chapter 34.05 RCW relating to adjudicative proceedings. The board, any member of the board, and the board's tax referees also have all powers granted the department of revenue pursuant to RCW 82.32.110. In the case of appeals within the scope of RCW 82.03.130(1)(b), the board, or any member thereof, may obtain such assistance, including the making of field investigations, from the staff of the director of revenue as the board, or any member thereof, may deem necessary or appropriate: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That any communication, oral or written, from the staff of the director to the board or its tax referees may be presented only in open hearing.
Notes:
Effective date—1989 c 175: See note following RCW 34.05.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1980–1980 · leading case: Transamerica Title Ins. v. Hoppe, 611 P.2d 1361 (Wash. Ct. App. 1980).
Transamerica Title Ins. v. Hoppe, 611 P.2d 1361 (Wash. Ct. App. 1980). “Defendants *152 requested a formal hearing pursuant to RCW 82.03.160. Defendants instituted a declaratory judgment action in the Superior Court for Thurston County seeking an order that the appeals (consolidated by order of the BTA) be heard exclusively at a formal hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.