Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 82.24.030 (2026)
Stamps
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) In order to enforce collection of the tax hereby levied, the department of revenue must design and have printed stamps of such size and denominations as may be determined by the department. The stamps must be affixed on the smallest container or package that will be handled, sold, used, consumed, or distributed, to permit the department to readily ascertain by inspection, whether or not such tax has been paid or whether an exemption from the tax applies.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, only a wholesaler may cause to be affixed on every package of cigarettes, stamps of an amount equaling the tax due thereon or stamps identifying the cigarettes as exempt before he or she sells, offers for sale, uses, consumes, handles, removes, or otherwise disturbs and distributes the same. However, where it is established to the satisfaction of the department that it is impractical to affix such stamps to the smallest container or package, the department may authorize the affixing of stamps of appropriate denomination to a large container or package.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, only wholesalers may purchase or obtain cigarette stamps. Wholesalers may not sell or provide stamps to any other wholesaler or person.
(4) Each roll of stamps, or group of sheets, must have a separate serial number, which is legible at the point of sale. The department of revenue must keep records of which wholesaler purchases each roll or group of sheets. If the department of revenue permits wholesalers to purchase partial rolls or sheets, in no case may stamps bearing the same serial number be sold to more than one wholesaler. The remainder of the roll or sheet, if any, must either be retained for later purchases by the same wholesaler or destroyed.
(5) Nothing in this section may be construed as limiting any otherwise lawful activity under a cigarette tax compact pursuant to chapter 43.06 RCW.
(6) In order to enforce collection of the tax in the case of roll-your-own cigarettes, a retailer must affix a stamp or stamps to each box or similar container provided by the retailer to the consumer. The box or similar container must be used by a consumer to transport roll-your-own cigarettes from the retailer's place of business. A retailer must provide cigarette tubes to a consumer in one or more twenty unit denominations. Stamps must be for an amount equaling the tax due under this chapter. Each cigarette tube or paper provided to the consumer is deemed a cigarette for purposes of imposing and collecting taxes under this chapter. Stamps for roll-your-own cigarettes must be issued and affixed in a manner determined by the department but as consistent as practicable with the stamping requirements for wholesalers.
[ 2012 2nd sp.s. c 4 s 2; 2003 c 114 s 2; 1995 c 278 s 2; 1990 c 216 s 1; 1975 1st ex.s. c 278 s 61; 1961 c 15 s 82.24.030. Prior: 1959 c 270 s 3; prior: 1949 c 228 s 13, part; 1943 c 156 s 11, part; 1941 c 178 s 13, part; 1939 c 225 s 23, part; 1935 c 180 s 82, part; Rem. Supp. 1949 s 8370-82, part.]
Notes:
Effective date—2012 2nd sp.s. c 4: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect July 1, 2012." [ 2012 2nd sp.s. c 4 s 13.]
Effective date—1995 c 278: See note following RCW 82.24.010.
Construction—Severability—1975 1st ex.s. c 278: See notes following RCW 11.08.160.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1974–2017 · leading case: United States v. Fiander, 547 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Fiander, 547 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2008). “Indian tribal organization, who, after notice has been given to the board as provided in this section, brings or causes to be brought into the state unstamped cigarettes, if within a period of time after receipt of the cigarettes as the depart *1039 ment determines by rule to be…”
United States v. Funds From First Reg'l Bank Account XXXXX1859 Held in the Name of R K Co., 639 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (W.D. Wash. 2009). “Wash. Rev. Code § 82.24.030 (1)-(2); Fiander, 547 F.”
Bercier v. Kiga, 103 P.3d 232 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “RCW 82.24.030. The State requires wholesalers and certain retailers to keep detailed records of the purchase and sale of cigarettes.”
Bercier v. Kiga, 127 Wash. App. 809 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “RCW 82.24.030. The State requires wholesalers and certain retailers to keep detailed records of the purchase and sale of cigarettes.”
Robertson v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd., 10 P.3d 1079 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “ding an Indian tribal organization, who, after notice has been given to the board as provided in this section, brings or causes to be brought into the state unstamped cigarettes, if within a period of time after receipt of the cigarettes as the department determines by rule to…”
P. Lorillard Co. v. City of Seattle, 521 P.2d 208 (Wash. 1974). “RCW 82.24.030. Its measure is a specified rate per cigarette.”
Matheson v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd., 130 P.3d 897 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 82.24.030(2). ¶9 Mr. Matheson’s main contention is that Washington’s cigarette tax, as applied to him as an Indian, is contrary to federal and constitutional law.”
Robertson v. State Liquor Control Bd., 10 P.3d 1079 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “ding an Indian tribal organization, who, after notice has been given to the board as provided in this section, brings or causes to be brought into the state unstamped cigarettes, if within a period of time after receipt of the cigarettes as the department determines by rule to…”
Nisqually Indian Tribe v. Gregoire, 649 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (W.D. Wash. 2009). “The State collects the tax through the sale of cigarette stamps, which must be affixed to all packages of cigarettes possessed within the State that have not been pre-approved for tax exemption.”
Matheson v. State Liquor Control Bd., 130 P.3d 897 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 82.24.030. ¶ 9 Mr. Matheson's main contention is that Washington's cigarette tax, as applied to him as an Indian, is contrary to federal and Constitutional law.”
United States v. Mahoney-Meyer, 294 F. App'x 267 (9th Cir. 2008). “Wash. Rev. Code § 82.24.030 . Native Americans may purchase unstamped cigarettes for resale to Native Americans if they obtain pre-approval from the Washington Department of Revenue.”
Cougar Den, Inc. v. Dep't of Licensing (Wash. 2017). “See RCW 82.24.030. Individuals other than licensed wholesalers may transport unstamped cigarettes only if they have "given notice to the [Washington State Liquor Control Board] in advance of the commencement of transportation.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.24.030(1) — 3 cases
United States v. Fiander, 547 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2008). “Indian tribal organization, who, after notice has been given to the board as provided in this section, brings or causes to be brought into the state unstamped cigarettes, if within a period of time after receipt of the cigarettes as the depart *1039 ment determines by rule to be…”
Cougar Den, Inc. v. Dep't of Licensing (Wash. 2017). “See RCW 82.24.030. Individuals other than licensed wholesalers may transport unstamped cigarettes only if they have "given notice to the [Washington State Liquor Control Board] in advance of the commencement of transportation.”
Cougar Den, Inc. v. Dep't of Licensing (Wash. 2017).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.24.030(2) — 1 case
Matheson v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd., 130 P.3d 897 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 82.24.030(2). ¶9 Mr. Matheson’s main contention is that Washington’s cigarette tax, as applied to him as an Indian, is contrary to federal and constitutional law.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 82.24.030(l) — 1 case
United States v. Funds From First Reg'l Bank Account XXXXX1859 Held in the Name of R K Co., 639 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (W.D. Wash. 2009). “Wash. Rev. Code § 82.24.030 (1)-(2); Fiander, 547 F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.