Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 84.48.065 (2026)
Cancellation and correction of erroneous assessments and assessments on property on which land use designation is changed
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1)(a) The county assessor or treasurer may cancel or correct assessments on the assessment or tax rolls which are erroneous due to manifest errors in description, double assessments, clerical errors in extending the rolls, and such manifest errors in the listing of the property that do not involve a revaluation of property, except in the case that a taxpayer produces proof that an authorized land use authority has made a definitive change in the property's land use designation. In such a case, correction of the assessment or tax rolls may be made notwithstanding the fact that the action involves a revaluation of property. Manifest errors that do not involve a revaluation of property include the assessment of property exempted by law from taxation or the failure to deduct the exemption allowed by law to the head of a family. When the county assessor cancels or corrects an assessment, the assessor must send a notice to the taxpayer in accordance with RCW 84.40.045, advising the taxpayer that the action has been taken and notifying the taxpayer of the right to appeal the cancellation or correction to the county board of equalization, in accordance with RCW 84.40.038. When the county assessor or treasurer cancels or corrects an assessment, a record of the action must be prepared, setting forth therein the facts relating to the error. The record must also set forth by legal description all property belonging exclusively to the state, any county, or any municipal corporation whose property is exempt from taxation, upon which there remains, according to the tax roll, any unpaid taxes.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (1)(b), no manifest error cancellation or correction, including a cancellation or correction made due to a definitive change of land use designation, may be made for any period more than three years preceding the year in which the error is discovered. However, a manifest error cancellation or correction may be made for a period more than three years preceding the year in which the error is discovered if authorized by the county legislative authority and the manifest error cancellation or correction would result in a refund or reduction of taxes for a property owner.
(2)(a) In the case of a definitive change of land use designation, an assessor must make corrections that involve a revaluation of property to the assessment roll when:
(i) The assessor and taxpayer have signed an agreement as to the true and fair value of the taxpayer's property setting forth in the agreement the valuation information upon which the agreement is based; and
(ii) The assessment roll has previously been certified in accordance with RCW 84.40.320.
(b) In all other cases, an assessor must make corrections that involve a revaluation of property to the assessment roll when:
(i) The assessor and taxpayer have signed an agreement as to the true and fair value of the taxpayer's property setting forth in the agreement the valuation information upon which the agreement is based; and
(ii) The following conditions are met:
(A) The assessment roll has previously been certified in accordance with RCW 84.40.320;
(B) The taxpayer has timely filed a petition with the county board of equalization pursuant to RCW 84.40.038 for the current assessment year;
(C) The county board of equalization has not yet held a hearing on the merits of the taxpayer's petition.
(3) The assessor must issue a supplementary roll or rolls including such cancellations and corrections, and the assessment and levy have the same force and effect as if made in the first instance, and the county treasurer must proceed to collect the taxes due on the rolls as modified.
[ 2015 c 174 s 2; 2001 c 187 s 23; 1997 c 3 s 110 (Referendum Bill No. 47, approved November 4, 1997); 1996 c 296 s 1; 1992 c 206 s 12; 1989 c 378 s 14; 1988 c 222 s 25.]
Notes:
Contingent effective date—2001 c 187: See note following RCW 84.70.010.
Application—2001 c 187: See note following RCW 84.40.020.
Application—Severability—Part headings not law—Referral to electorate—1997 c 3: See notes following RCW 84.40.030.
Effective date—1992 c 206: See note following RCW 82.04.170.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: Ppf Amli 1260 Repub. Street, Llc, App V. John Wilson, Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2024).
Ppf Amli 1260 Repub. Street, Llc, App V. John Wilson, Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “The Assessor corrected the mistake under RCW 84.48.065, resulting in a higher tax bill for AMLI.”
Legacy Partners Riverpark Apts Bldgs. A/b, Llc, App. v. King Cnty., Res. (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “The Assessor also sent notices to Legacy as required under RCW 84.48.065, explaining the value change was because ofa "failfure] to post.”
Palmer D. Strand, et ux v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “038; RCW 84.48.065, .150; WAC 458-14-056. A taxpayer wishing to appeal an assessed value must generally file a written notice with the county board by July 1 of the assessment year.”
Rec Solar Grade Silicon, Llc v. Melissa McKnight (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “038; RCW 84.48.065; WAC 458-14-056. If dissatisfied with the result of the appeal to the county board, the taxpayer may appeal to the BTA.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 84.48.065(1) — 1 case
Legacy Partners Riverpark Apts Bldgs. A/b, Llc, App. v. King Cnty., Res. (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “The Assessor also sent notices to Legacy as required under RCW 84.48.065, explaining the value change was because ofa "failfure] to post.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 84.48.065(1)(a) — 1 case
Ppf Amli 1260 Repub. Street, Llc, App V. John Wilson, Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “The Assessor corrected the mistake under RCW 84.48.065, resulting in a higher tax bill for AMLI.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.