Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.35
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.35.030 (2026)

Soliciting undesired mail

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly use a means of identification or financial information of another person to solicit undesired mail with the intent to annoy, harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass that person.
(2) Violation of this section is a misdemeanor.
(3) Additionally, a person who violates this section is liable for civil damages of five hundred dollars or actual damages, including costs to repair the person's credit record, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorneys' fees as determined by the court.
[ 2001 c 217 s 10; 2000 c 77 s 1.]

Notes:

Captions not law—2001 c 217: See note following RCW 9.35.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: State v. Evans, 298 P.3d 724 (Wash. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Evans, 298 P.3d 724 (Wash. 2013). “¶45 RCW 9.35.030(1) makes it “unlawful for any person to knowingly use a means of identification or financial information of another person to solicit undesired mail with the intent to annoy, harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass that person.”
State v. Evans (Wash. 2013). “RCW 9.35.030(1) makes it "unlawful for any person to knowingly use a means of identification or financial information of another person to solicit undesired mail with the intent to annoy, harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass that person.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.35.030(1) — 2 cases
State v. Evans, 298 P.3d 724 (Wash. 2013). “¶45 RCW 9.35.030(1) makes it “unlawful for any person to knowingly use a means of identification or financial information of another person to solicit undesired mail with the intent to annoy, harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass that person.”
State v. Evans (Wash. 2013). “RCW 9.35.030(1) makes it "unlawful for any person to knowingly use a means of identification or financial information of another person to solicit undesired mail with the intent to annoy, harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass that person.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.